A04: Proposal+5

Research Proposal Plus 5 Sources

The Pitch

Our classroom discussions about counterintuitive topics have been, essentially, preparation for your own research plans. This assignment will be your first chance to pitch a topic of your own. You’ll begin at the list of counterintuitive topics linked to the sidebar, then mine the subject matter you find there (or follow a train of thought to an original topic of your own), then briefly present your pitch to research a particular hypothesis.

If you make a strong enough case to investigate a narrow, counterintuitive premise, I’ll be happy for you to develop and support a thesis with further research.

If you pitch a topic that is too broad, hard to research, impossible to argue or verify, I’ll respond with a request for further refinement of your hypothesis.

Specific. Arguable. Researchable. Verifiable.

While reading on your topic, develop a counterintuitive hypothesis, then formalize your proposal in writing and share the first five sources you’ve found relevant to your hypothesis. Choose a field of study that interests you so that the next several weeks will be pleasurable and rewarding instead of drudgery. But beyond enjoyable, the hypothesis you propose must also be specific, arguable, researchable, verifiable.

You’ll be even more clear in your White Paper several weeks from now, but before class next Wednesday, I’ll need just a proposal with sources. Following is an example from an earlier semester. Username explains the relevance of her first five sources to her nascent hypothesis.

Username‘s Proposal

For my research essay I will be examining America’s judicial flaw of false convictions. A study conducted by The University of Virginia in 2007 investigated the court cases of 200 death row inmates and found that a majority of them were innocent people being held in prison for a average of 12 years despite substantial evidence of their innocence that the court system failed to notice. As a nation that takes its law and justice system extremely seriously, America should not tolerate so catastrophic a failure. However, this problem is shockingly common and each year more than 10,000 innocent people go to prison for crimes that they did not commit.

While the most common reason for false convictions is eyewitness misidentification; another problem is the failure to consider DNA evidence that could potentially free the innocent person and place the guilty one behind bars. This problem is mind-blowing considering we live in a country that is so focused on justice and placing the guilty in prison. It is inexcusable how so many innocent people get sent to jail because prosecutors and crime scene investigators choose to dismiss extremely important evidence.

Is the Hypothesis Specific?

—AVOID: Naming a topic instead of a hypothesis.
“False convictions” is a topic, not a thesis. It would not be specific enough for a thesis. Username has avoided that pitfall.

—AVOID: Survey proposals.
“Suspects are falsely convicted for many different reasons” promises nothing but a survey of somewhat related material. It has no argument value and does not result in a proposal. Username has avoided that pitfall.

—CREATE: Controversial premise.
“False convictions are deliberate attempts to get convictions whether or not the suspect is guilty” is a valid, specific proposition that invites argument and that, if true, would demand a remedy. Username hasn’t specifically named this premise, but she could.

Is the Hypothesis Arguable?

—AVOID: Too Broad an argument.
“Many convicts are wrongfully incarcerated.” The premise can be interpreted to mean, among other things, 1) sentences are too long for misdemeanors, 2) laws are inconsistent across jurisdictions, 3) people who commit worse crimes are free, 4) youthful offenders should get probation, 5) thousands of defendants take “plea deals” for jail time to avoid more serious charges, or 6) poor defendants get weak legal defense. The argument is too broad to be meaningful.

—AVOID: Too Vague an argument.
“Convicts are jailed because of problems with evidence.” The premise might mean that police don’t gather enough evidence, that forensic technology is not sophisticated, that evidence can be corrupted or mishandled, that juries don’t know how to interpret evidence, that prosecutors suppress evidence, that evidence can be planted to frame suspects, that eyewitness evidence is unreliable, and on, and on.

—CREATE: A narrow framework for argument.
“Prosecutors unmask their true intentions when they attempt to suppress new exculpatory evidence.” This premise can certainly be argued. Username is already citing sources that identify death row inmates who have sought (and been denied) new trials when DNA evidence proves their innocence. The question: “Why would a prosecutor attempt to thwart justice by refusing to examine evidence that could free a wrongly convicted prisoner and put the real criminal in jail?” creates an opportunity for a narrow and controversial argument.

Is the Hypothesis Researchable?

—AVOID: Arguments about people’s feelings or beliefs.
That “prosecutors ignore new exculpatory evidence because they’re embarrassed to have convicted the wrong suspect” may very well be true, but it can’t be researched. Prosecutors are very unlikely to admit they made mistakes at all in gaining convictions. They’re much less likely to express embarrassment. Where would you look for the evidence?

—AVOID: Arguments that won’t be settled in your lifetime.
It would be pointless to argue that in fifty or sixty years every human will be DNA-coded at birth and that the failure to find a particular suspect’s DNA at the scene of a crime will automatically exonerate that suspect. No evidence of that future condition can be researched.

—CHOOSE: Researchable evidence.
On the other hand, you could argue that “since eye-witness testimony is proved unreliable by DNA evidence a staggering percentage of the time, no more suspects should ever be convicted of capital offenses without at least some physical evidence.” Numbers on faulty eye witnesses, wrongful convictions, and DNA reversals can all be researched.

Is the Hypothesis Verifiable?

—AVOID: Hypotheses with vague terms.
“Most of today’s death row inmates would be free if the court system was fairer.” The premise might be tempting for Username, but it’s too vague to verify. For example, a system that demanded stronger proof might exonerate a convict for his capital crime, but it might for different reasons have convicted him of related crimes committed at the same time or earlier. A “fairer” system might actually convict a larger, not a smaller, percentage of suspects.

—AVOID: Hypotheses with unverifiable conclusions.
Username might be tempted to claim that “Prosecutors and police do more harm than good by coercing eye witnesses to identify suspects.” When those witnesses err, and convictions result, the system may be to blame. But it’s also surely true that many witnesses who assist in rightful convictions would not have done so if not pressured to testify. The proportion of “coerced correct” to “coerced false” convictions is almost certainly unverifiable.

—CHOOSE: Hypotheses that can be quantified.
“Hundreds of death row inmates were convicted on the basis of eye witness testimony alone, evidence that has been clearly demonstrated to be too fallible for capital convictions,” for example. If that proves to be true, it provides the factual basis for a strong thesis, that no suspect should be convicted of a capital crime on the basis of eye witness testimony alone, AND that anyone currently on death row for such convictions deserves a new trial when new physical evidence is available.

Username‘s Sources

1. “Wrongful Convictions: The American Experience

Background: This article discusses the depth of wrongful convictions in the United States as well as other nations such as Canada. It focuses on how wrongful convictions occur and organizations that are working to try and prevent them.

How I Intend to Use It: This article will help me discover the most common reasons why innocent people end up in prison. It lists at least seven possible reasons as to how wrongful convictions happen which will all help me eventually find ways to prevent this problem from occurring.

2. “Study Suspects Thousands of False Convictions

Background: This article from The New York Times focuses on a study conducted by The University of Michigan about 328 criminal cases in which the convicted person was released from prison. Upon finding this evidence, the University believed that thousands of innocent people are in prison for crimes they did not commit. While the article does not fixate on DNA exonerations, there is a large portion of it that suggests new DNA evidence can easily overturn wrongful convictions.

How I Intend to Use It: The information about DNA exonerations will be extremely useful to me as a major aspect of my argument will be DNA evidence that gets ignored. The study also highlights exactly how large of a problem false convictions are in the United States by using a small group of convicted inmates and discovering exactly how many of them are actually innocent, something I will be trying to prove in my essay on a larger scale.

3. 250 Exonerated, Too Many Wrongly Convicted

Background: This extraordinary document from “The Innocence Project”details the cases of 250 convicts falsely imprisoned, many for 20 years or more, on the basis of misidentification, false testimony, questionable evidence, or flawed test results. The Innocence Project is dedicated to helping free innocent victims that were falsely convicted. It uses DNA evidence to exclude convicts who have consistently and loudly protested their innocence of the crimes they’ve been convicted of.

How I Intend to Use It: I plan on using the information found in this document to provide concrete examples of people that were helped by the discovery or reopening of DNA or other evidence. This will further prove my point that so many innocent people go to prison for crimes they do not commit because law enforcement did not take the time to intensely go over every detail in a case.

4. “Prosecutors Block Access to DNA Testing for Inmates

Background: This article focuses on two men, one of which is in prison for a rape he insists he did not commit, and the other who says DNA evidence would prove he was falsely convicted of a double murder. The article states that prosecutors often resist reopening cases despite the fact that the reinstitution of a closed case could potentially free an innocent person from prison.

How I Intend to Use It: This article is entirely focused on the lengths that prosecutors go in order to step around the idea of reopening a case to do further DNA testing. Quite often, law enforcers are content with placing a person in prison and to them, a person in jail is a win whether they are innocent or not. This obviously is a major flaw in the justice system and I intend to expose this flaw with the help of this article as it offers a backstage pass into the world of criminology.

5. “Criminology” Beirne, Piers, and Messerschmidt, James. Criminology. Fort Worth, Texas. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1991.

Background: This book provides background on all things related to Criminology. There is an entire chapter dedicated to false convictions that discusses all matters related to the problem.

How I Intend to Use It: This book will be very helpful to me when I am looking for background information and trying to become educated on the topic of criminology for the purposes of this essay. When I am looking for definitions and important things to know, I will reference this book.

Assignment Specifics

  1. Write a formal version of your research proposal, identifying what you expect to find, or hope to find, or are open to finding, in as much detail as you can manage.
  2. The proposal can be brief, provided it is clear. Your plan is preliminary and will not obligate you to remain faithful, but it should be offered in good faith. (It’s a proposal, not your wedding vows. You can change your mind without a lawyer.)
  3. Identify and link to your best 5 sources. Find academic sources if possible. If not, ask yourself: “Is the Hypothesis Researchable?” As in the model assignment above, describe the value you believe the sources have in proving your hypothesis.
  4. Post your Research Proposal and Sources in the A04: Proposal+5 category.

Grade Details

DUE NOON TUE SEP 29
Customary late penalties. (0-24 hours 10%) (24-48 hours 20%) (48+ hours, 0 grade)
Non-Portfolio grade category

Posted in Assignments, davidbdale, Professor Post, Proposal Archives | Leave a comment

E04: Critical Reading-hiralp365

Is PTSD contagious?

It makes you question yourself is this a disease that is spreadable, contaminating everything around you.

BRANNAN VINES HAS NEVER BEEN to war.

  • This is a casual claim, that she hasn’t acquired any kind of warrior skills.

But she’s got a warrior’s skills: hyperawareness, hypervigilance, adrenaline-sharp quick-scanning for danger, for triggers.

  • A categorical claim is made here. These are some of the symptoms a PSTD affected person would acquire.

He’s one of 103,200, or 228,875, or 336,000 Americans who served in Iraq or Afghanistan and came back with PTSD depending on whom you ask, and one of 115,000 to 456,000 with traumatic brain injury.

  • A categorical claim is made here, in which it suggests he’s part of this group of

Hypervigilance sounds innocuous, but it is in fact exhaustingly distressing, a conditioned response to life-threatening situations.

  • A definition claim is made, defining what hyper vigilance sounds can do.

Caleb has been home since 2006, way more than enough time for Brannan to catch his symptoms. tell

A definition claim is made in which it provides us the time it takes for an individual to acquire this disease.

Caleb screaming at Brannan because she’s just woken him up from a nightmare, after making sure she’s at least an arm’s length away in case he wakes up swinging

This is a casual claim saying one of the causes of PTSD.

Now, he’s rounder, heavier, bearded, and long-haired, obviously tough even if he weren’t prone to wearing a COMBAT INFANTRYMAN cap, but still not the guy you picture when you see his “Disabled Veteran” license plates.

A categorical claim, describing him in positive way and different.

Some hypotheses for why PTSD only tortures some trauma victims blame it on unhappily coded proteins, or a misbehaving amygdala.

A categorical claiming, suggesting what is one of the cause of PTSD torturing trauma victims.

In one study, the incidence of secondary trauma in wives of Croatian war vets with PTSD was 30 percent

A categorical claim  that suggests 30% women acquire PTSD through secondary trauma.

Posted in Critical Reading PTSD | Leave a comment

E04: Critical Reading – themildewmuncher7

1.   “Is PTSD contagious?”

  • There must be some backing to this question, else it would not have been asked
  • PTSD presented as a sickness, if it could be contagious
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder is a real thing, as the title suggests

2. “It’s rampant among returning vets—and now their spouses and kids are starting to show the same symptoms.”

  • PTSD is rampant amongst vets… do all of them have it?
  • Vets are only ones that can acquire PTSD
  • Used in this sense it seems to be more like a spreadable disease
  • Spouses and kids starting to show the same symptoms – as a result of the vets

3. “Brannan Vines has never been to war. But she’s got a warrior’s skills: hyperawareness, hypervigilance, adrenaline-sharp quick-scanning for danger, for triggers. Super stimuli-sensitive.”

  • Brannan has never been to war.
  • Warrior’s skills include hyperawareness, hypervigilance, etc.
  • Brannan is a warrior despite never being to war.
  • Triggers are a big factor in her symptoms, as she scans for them.

4.  “And as slippery as all that is, even less understood is the collateral damage, to families, to schools, to society—emotional and fiscal costs borne long after the war is over.”

  • Collateral damage from PTSD is implied, and even less understood than the already-misunderstood disorder itself.
  • There are costs after war itself ends due to this.

5. “Caleb has been home since 2006, way more than enough time for Brannan to catch his symptoms. The house, in a subdivision a little removed from one of many shopping centers in a small town in the southwest corner of Alabama, is often quiet as a morgue.”

  • Caleb has not been exposed to PTSD-inducing war since 2006. This article was released in early 2013.
  • Brannan “caught” the symptoms that he was displaying.
  • Implies that it is in fact contagious.
  • Their house is quiet, meaning it is very unlikely to have a noise issue relating to the PTSD.

An hour has expired.

Posted in Critical Reading PTSD | 2 Comments

Critical Reading- PTSD- bj112295

“But she’s got a warrior’s skills: hyperawareness, hypervigilance, adrenaline-sharp quick-scanning for danger, for triggers.”

Brannan is subject to this category. She has unusual skills from a regular person in her position. This makes you automatically assume that her skills come from PTSD, but no one can really prove it. Being a hard worker and always being tired drags on the body and can cause these symptons, and plus she is always busy and rarely gets a good night sleep.

“She was recently standing behind a sweet old lady counting out change when she suddenly became so furious her ears literally started ringing.”

A lot of people out there that were born to parents who raised them improperly or not correct and they act crazy and are not diagnosed with PTSD. The articles author wants you to have compassion for the old lady that is why it seems as though its all Brannans fault. Older folks really tend to have memory loss or forget a lot of things. These are some reasons unto why many people are nice to the elderly people and even though Brannan has no affiliation with this women, the author makes it seem as though the old lady is of innocence.

“Her nose starts running she’s so pissed, and there she is standing in a CVS, snotty and deaf with rage, like some kind of maniac, because a tiny elderly woman needs an extra minute”.

The impatience that is exposed in her is really more than likely told about 10x more than what actually happened. Nothing happens, yeah she gets fired up at the women but she stays to herself. The warrior skills description having her nose flared up or snotty really has nothing to do with the elderly women unless action was physically taken. There is another characteristic being subjected to the old lady description -she’s tiny and old and sweet, so she looks even more helpless comparing to the “kind of maniac”, pissed, healthy middle aged woman.

“Brannan Vines has never been to war, but her husband, Caleb, was sent to Iraq twice, where he served in the infantry as a designated marksman.”

This controversy about Brannan seems to be very unlikely to be like him , this sentence has shown up twice already and there is no way that you can begin this sentence, if they would of just wanted to speak to her about her husband only. There is a connection made between her husband being at war and her mental problems she is having at this dramatic time in her life.

Posted in Critical Reading PTSD | Leave a comment

Critical Reading—zoeyzoey

Is PTSD contagious?

  • This question states that something that someone gets from a tragic situation.
  • PTSD is thought of as a big issue where people seem to react erratically to small things that may annoy someone normally but we do not outburst to it.
  • Its stating a question due to it placing the word “is” before PTSD.

Brannan is hypervigilance and hyperaware of everything. She had never been to war and is going through difficult time. She is reacting to things in ways she shouldn’t. She has a bad temper and is very impatient.

“Brannan Vines has never been to war, but her husband, Caleb, was sent to Iraq twice, where he served in the infantry as a designated marksman.”

Brannan’s husband, Calab went to war and came back with a brain trauma.

“Calab has been home since 2006, way more than enough time for Brannan to catch these symptoms.”

  • The question previously was “is this contagious?”
  • They do not watch tv at home because it triggers it.
  • Their house is far from the town which gives them more time are home to be spent with no neighbors to interact with and for more noises to hear in the secluded area.

“Whatever is happening to Calab, is as old as war itself.”

This just comes to show that many people during war get PTSD. Some people do not know how to react to those that have it and aren’t very happy to know that there are people that can get affected in this way. Doctors themselves do not even know what causes this to some individuals. It is still unaware what strikes the brain to act the way it does.

Time up

Posted in Critical Reading PTSD | Leave a comment

E04: Critical Reading—wildcuttlefish

Paragraph 1:

“But she’s got a warrior’s skills: hyperawareness, hypervigilance, adrenaline-sharp quick-scanning for danger, for triggers. Super stimuli-sensitive…”

-This is a categorical claim, showing readers the warrior skills that Brannan has, which is abnormal for someone who has not been to war. It makes me feel very curious in why she is so super stimuli-senstive.

“Being too cognizant of every sound—every coin dropping an echo—she explodes inwardly, fury flash-incinerating any normal tolerance for a fellow patron with a couple of dollars in quarters and dimes.”

-This is a casual claim. What it is implying is, Brannan has burst of rage because she is too cognizant of sound and has little tolerance. I love the auditory imagery in this sentence with the echo, and visual imagery when she “explodes inwardly…” with “flash incinerating any normal tolerance…” The description adds emphasis on how angry she is over a small issue. It’s just an old lady paying for soap. It makes me wonder how she acts with problems at home and at her work, it makes me wonder about her family.

Paragraph 4:

“Caleb has been home since 2006, way more than enough time for Brannan to catch his symptoms”

-Casual claim, this sentence implies that Caleb is the root of the rage and abnormal behaivor. Interestingly, the sentence says that his symptoms were caught as if it was a sickness. How can you catch PTSD? Also, this sentence also hints that it takes a long time for people to be influenced or changed by the person with PTSD. This makes me wonder how the family handled Caleb’s change.

“When a sound erupts—Caleb screaming at Brannan because she’s just woken him up from a nightmare…”

-This is a casual claim, revealing how sensitive Caleb is to sound, resulting in him screaming at his wife. If he is so sensitive to sound, it must make it hard to live in a house with him.

“Even when everyone’s in the family room watching TV, it’s only connected to Netflix and not to cable, since news is often a trigger…”

-Casual claim, showing readers that even watching Tv, the family has to be cautious because the sounds from the news could trigger Caleb. Also, the family cannot live the same as before, like simply watching the news, some adjustments were made because of Caleb, and it isn’t just how they watch TV.

“Their German shepherd, a service dog trained to help veterans with PTSD,  is ready to alert Caleb to triggers by barking, or to calm him by jumping onto his chest”

-This could be a definition claim because it is telling readers what Caleb’s service dog is, a trained dog to help veterans with PTSD. In addition, this could be a categorical claim because it is listing the task the service dog is trained to do like calming Caleb and barking. People with PTSD needs a lot of attention and reassurance. It is good that there are service dogs in this world.

Paragraph 7:

“Now, he’s rounder, heavier, bearded, and long-haired, obviously tough even if he weren’t prone to wearing a COMBAT INFANTRYMAN cap…”

-Categorical claim, describing Caleb’s appearance.

Paragraph 8:

“Caleb is so sensitive to light, why he can’t just watch the news like a regular person without feeling as if he might catch fire.”

-Casual claim, telling readers why he cannot watch the news because he will think he might catch fire. PTSD is more than just stress, it is affect people’s lives and mental health.

“Some hypotheses for why PTSD only tortures some trauma victims blame it on unhappily coded proteins, or a misbehaving amygdala. Family history, or maybe previous trauma.”

-Categorial claim, telling readers what might be the cause of Caleb’s PTSD.

Paragraph 11:

“Granted, diagnosing PTSD is a tricky thing. The result of a malfunctioning nervous system that fails to normalize after trauma and instead perpetrates memories and misfires life-or-death stress for no practical reason, it comes in a couple of varieties, various complexities, has causes ranging from one lightning-fast event to drawn-out terrors or patterns of abuse—in soldiers, the incidence of PTSD goes up with thenumber of tours and amount of combatexperienced…”

-Definition claim, this is a very detailed description of what PTSD is.

“And the fact that the science hasn’t fully caught up with the suffering, that Caleb can’t point to something provably, biologically ruining his life, just makes him feel worse.”

-I think this is a casual claim, because it tells readers that Caleb does not know the definite cause of his PTSD because science and doctors still hasn’t figured it out. It must be frustrating for Caleb to not know whats going on with him exactly, especially with today’s technology.

Paragraph 13:

he was in at least 20 explosions—IEDs, vehicle-borne IEDs, RPGs.

-Categorical, tells readers the explosions Caleb went through.

“Trauma is a contagious disease; it affects everyone that has close contact with a traumatized person” in some form or another, to varying degrees and for different lengths of time.”

-Definition claim, this describes PTSD that it is a contagious disease, which is probably just an analogy. The point is, when one person is affected by trauma, it affects the people around them.

Paragraph 22:

“Holocaust survivors ‘had more resources and networks, wider family members and community to support them to adapt to their new circumstances after a war.’They were not, in other words, expected to man up and get over it.”

-This is casual claim, because it shows that the holocaust survivors did well after war because they had more resources and better circumstances that helped them get over the trauma. This reveals that most people from war don’t have to be victims of PTSD, they just need a lot of support like the holocaust survivors did. There is an attitude towards PTSD that it is shell shock or irritable heart, but people need to take it more seriously and give much support to soldiers coming from war.

Paragraph 25:

“…for the vast majority of people with the secondary traumatization model, the most important way to help the family deal with things is to ensure that the veteran gets effective treatment…”

-Casual claim, saying what is best is to get effective treatment.

Paragraph 27:

“Brannan is a force of keeping her family together. She sleeps a maximum of five hours a night, keeps herself going with fast food and energy drinks, gets Katie to and from school and to tap dance and art, where Katie produces some startlingly impressive canvases, bright swirling shapes bisected by and intersected with other swaths of color, bold, intricate.”

-Categorical, She has to keep herself going with fast food and energy drinks, how exhausting! This shows the extra work Brannan has to endure because of her husband’s condition. She has to work harder for to keep her family together.

“That’s typical parent stuff, but Brannan also keeps Caleb on his regimen of 12 pills—antidepressants, anti-anxiety, sleep aids, pain meds, nerve meds, stomach meds—plus weekly therapy, and sometimes weekly physical therapy for a cartilage-lacking knee…”

-Categorical, not only does Brannan has to care for her daughter, Katie, she has to care for her husband also. She has to be very prepared with many medications for her husband, this shows how much Brannan’s life has changed from a normal life to having many responsibilities for her family.

Paragraph 28

Family of a Vet, a nonprofit created “to help you find your way, find the information you need, and find a way not only to cope with life after combat…but to survive and thrive!”

-Definition claim, it is defining what the organization of Family of a Vet is.

Posted in Critical Reading PTSD | Leave a comment

E04 Is PTSD Contagious? – americangods01

“But she’s got a warrior’s skills: hyperawareness, hypervigilance, adrenaline-sharp quick-scanning for danger, for triggers. “

This is a definition claim defining hyperawareness, hypervigilance, adrenaline-sharp quick-scanning for danger as warrior skill.

This is also a categorical claim because it categorizes these traits as things that Brannan has.

where he served in the infantry as a designated marksman

Categorical claim categorizing Caleb in the military

He’s one of 103,200, or 228,875, or 336,000 Americans who served in Iraq or Afghanistan and came back with PTSD, depending on whom you ask, and one of 115,000 to 456,000 with traumatic brain injury.

Categorical claim categorizing the disabilities Caleb has

Hypervigilance sounds innocuous, but it is in fact exhaustingly distressing, a conditioned response to life-threatening situations

Definition claim defining hypervigilance as conditioned as well as only to life threatening situations

Caleb has been home since 2006, way more than enough time for Brannan to catch his symptoms

Definition claim defining how much time is needed to catch symptoms of PTSD

news is often a trigger

Definition claim defining news as a trigger for PTSD episodes

Their German shepherd, a service dog trained to help veterans with PTSD

Categorical claim categorizing their dog as a service dog and as a german shepherd

“She has not, unlike military wives she advises…”

Categorical claim categorizing Brannan from other military wives

plunging the living room back into its usual necessary darkness.

Definition claim defining the darkness as necessary

Brannan is 32 now, but in her portraits with the big white dress and lacy veil she’s not even old enough to drink

Categorical claim categorizing Brannan by age

Now, he’s rounder, heavier, bearded, and long-haired, obviously tough even if he weren’t prone to wearing a COMBAT INFANTRYMAN cap, but still not the guy you picture when you see his “Disabled Veteran” license plates. Not the old ‘Nam guy with a limp, or maybe the young legless Iraq survivor, that you’d expect.

Categorical claim categorizing Caleb as he’s rounder, heavier, bearded, and long-haired, obviously tough.

Definition claim defining disabled veteran

Definition claim defining what we’d expect

Some hypotheses for why PTSD only tortures some trauma victims blame it on unhappily coded proteins, or a misbehaving amygdala, family history, or maybe previous trauma.

Categorical claim categorizing these things as possible causes of PTSD

Whatever is happening to Caleb, it’s as old as war itself.

Categorical claim categorizing PTSD as old as war

The ancient historian Herodotus told of Greeks being honorably dismissed for being “out of heart” and “unwilling to encounter danger.” Civil War doctors, who couldn’t think of any other thing that might be unpleasant about fighting the Civil War but homesickness, diagnosed thousands with “nostalgia.” Later, it was deemed “irritable heart.” In World War I it was called “shell shock.” In World War II, “battle fatigue.”

Definition claim defining old terms for PTSD

Granted, diagnosing PTSD is a tricky thing. The result of a malfunctioning nervous system that fails to normalize after trauma and instead perpetrates memories and misfires life-or-death stress for no practical reason, it comes in a couple of varieties, various complexities, has causes ranging from one lightning-fast event to drawn-out terrors or patterns of abuse

Definition claim defining PTSD

Posted in Critical Reading PTSD | Leave a comment

Critical Reading- bigcounrty609

  1. Brannan Vines has warrior skills, although she has never been to war or trained in anyway. How is this possible?
  2. Caleb, her husband has been to iraq, it would make sense for him to have warrior skills
  3. Caleb is a victim of PTSD. He suffers but oddly so does his wife.
  4. Is PTSD contagious? It’s asking a question because of the word ‘is’.
  5. PTSD is contagious as is secondhand smoke. This makes sense and could be why the entire family suffers from this.
  6. Whatever is happening to Caleb is as old as war itself. This is stating how far it goes back and using war as comparison.
  7. Diagnosing PTSD is a tricky thing. Not only a general statement but shows how tricky this whole situation is with his family being as effected as they are.
  8. Secondary traumatic stress has been documented in the spouses of veterans with PTSD from Vietnam. This shows backup information on how Calebs wife is showing many symptoms.
  9. Suppose there is a second generation effect in veterans. Another valid piece of back up information that is suggesting that PTSD can be contagious.
Posted in Critical Reading PTSD | Leave a comment

Critical Reading – xChuki

“But she’s got a warrior’s skills: hyperawareness, hypervigilance, adrenaline-sharp quick-scanning for danger, for triggers.”

– a categorical claim that describer Brannan’s constant condition. She’s got skills that are not normal for an ordinary person in her surrounding. This claim makes you assume that her skills come from the PTSD, but there’s no proof for it. These symptoms could be caused by hard work and tiredness, because she gets just about 5 hours of sleep and she’s busy all the time and has no time to rest.

“She was recently standing behind a sweet old lady counting out change when she suddenly became so furious her ears literally started ringing”.

There are a lot of people out there that just were raised to be spoiled and inpatient, they act the same way and they have no PTSD on their clinical record. Reader is being manipulated and forced to feel compassion for the sweet old lady. First of all, elderly people are most likely to be helpless and suffer from a memory slips and feebleness. For those reasons, many people have sympathy to the older people, especially if they are sweet, even though Brannan most likely doesn’t know that lady, so it’s just assumed by author to get to the reader’s feelings.

“Her nose starts running she’s so pissed, and there she is standing in a CVS, snotty and deaf with rage, like some kind of maniac, because a tiny elderly woman needs an extra minute”.

This kind of impatience is most likely exaggerated with expressions and comparisons. Yes, she turns into a furious woman, but nothing happens, she keeps her emotions inside. The descriptions conflict with the warrior’s skills – being pissed, snotty and deaf with rage has nothing to do with it just because of an old lady, unless she provides any potential danger. One more characteristic is being added to the elderly lady description -she’s tiny and old and sweet, so she looks even more helpless comparing to the “kind of maniac”, pissed, healthy middle aged woman.

“Brannan Vines has never been to war, but her husband, Caleb, was sent to Iraq twice, where he served in the infantry as a designated marksman.”

The statement about Brannan seems to be unnecessary, it’s the second time it appears and there are other ways of starting this sentence, if author wanted to talk just about Brannan’s husband. However, she makes a connection between the woman’s mental problems, and her husband being to war at some point of his life.

Posted in Critical Reading PTSD | Leave a comment

Is PTSD Contagious? Claims

  1. The title says is PTSD Contaigous? Claiming it could be contained.
  2. Brannan Vines has warrior skills.
  3. Hes one of the Americans who came back from war and suffers with PTSD.
  4.  PTSD is not fully understood by society.
  5. Hypervigiliance is exhaustingly depressing.
  6. Caleb being home since 2006 gives Brannan enough time to catch the symptoms.
  7. Caleb and Brannan can get very tense with agitation.
  8. PTSD could be worse than a drug addiction.
  9. She sounds like she might start crying
  10. Author describes Caleb as a heavier, rounder, larger man.
  11. Its hard to understand Caleb’s injuries.
  12. He often times doesnt remember what happens later on.
  13. PTSD wasnt an official diagnosis until 1980.
  14. People do not respect or grasp PTSD.
  15. PTSD is tricky.
  16. Vets from Vietnam suffer from PTSD.
Posted in Critical Reading PTSD | 1 Comment