6 Responses to Fix the Possessives

1. tristanb50 says:

   April 18, 2023 at 8:37 am

   Opposition to San Diego’s public transport has long been argued by legislators, mostly conservatives in congress. As seen in Fox News’ opinion piece, large news sources desperately try to tear down public transport with the argument that the government is abusing its power to alter public behavior. Fox’s efforts are aligned with a trend among public transport’s detractors: to routinely underfund the asset, to then use its indigence against it, which some news outlets still report as if it’s current. Legislators argue that fees will impact low-income drivers the most, while it would be mostly to low-income driver’s benefit to swap cars for light rail or trolleys, and to everyone’s benefit to get their cars off city highways. The opposition makes no claims about the project’s actual goals. Compare San Diego’s low ridership to San Francisco’s 30%, or even Los Angeles’ 6%! Despite the worries that the government is trying to change the public’s behavior, it should be remembered that the public overwhelmingly support mass transportation. If its budget is slashed to operate as a last resort for people for people who can’t afford cars, thats who will ride it. The bottom line is, maintaining and owning cars is becoming more expensive regardless of whose in office.

   LikeLike

   Reply
2. sinatraman17 says:

   April 18, 2023 at 9:28 am

   Opposition to San Diego’s public transport has long been argued by legislators, mostly conservatives in Congress. As seen in Fox News’s opinion piece, large news sources desperately try to tear down public transport with the argument that the government is abusing its power to alter public behavior. Fox’s effort is aligned with a trend among public transport’s detractors: to routinely underfund the asset, to then use its indigence against it, which some news outlets still report as if it’s current. Legislators argue that fees will impact low-income drivers the most, while it would be mostly to low-income drivers’ benefit to swap cars for light rail or trolleys, and to everyone’s benefit to get their cars off the city’s highways. The opposition makes no claims about the project’s actual goals. Compare San Diego’s low ridership to San Francisco’s 30%, or even Los Angeles’s 6%! Despite the worries that the government is trying to change the public’s behavior, it should be remembered that the public overwhelmingly supports mass transportation. If its budget is slashed to operate as a last resort for people who can’t afford cars, that’s who will ride it. The bottom line is, maintaining and owning cars is becoming more expensive regardless of whose in office.

   LikeLike

   Reply
3. doglover846 says:

   April 18, 2023 at 10:05 am

   Opposition to San Diego’s public transport has long been argued by legislators, mostly conservatives in congress. As seen in Fox News’s opinion piece, large news sources desperately try to tear down public transport with the argument that the government is abusing its power to alter public behavior. Fox’s efforts are aligned with a trend among public transport’s detractors: to routinely underfund the asset, to then use its indigence against it, which some news outlets still report as if it’s current. Legislators argue that fees will impact low-income drivers the most, while it would be mostly to low-income drivers’ benefit to swap cars for light rail or trolleys, and to everyone’s benefit to get their cars off city highways. The opposition makes no claims about the project’s actual goals. Compare San Diego’s low ridership to San Francisco’s 30%, or even Los Angeles’s 6%! Despite the worries that the government is trying to change the public’s behavior, it should be remembered that the public overwhelmingly support mass transportation. If its budget is slashed to operate as a last resort for people for people who can’t afford cars, thats who will ride it. The bottom line is, maintaining and owning cars is becoming more expensive regardless of whose in office.

   LikeLike

   Reply
4. sortableelms says:

   April 18, 2023 at 10:07 am

   Opposition to San Diego’s public transport has long been argued by legislators, mostly conservatives in congress. As seen in Fox News’s opinion piece, large news sources desperately try to tear down public transport with the argument that the government is abusing its power to alter public behavior. Fox’s effort is aligned with a trend among public transports detractors: to routinely underfund the asset, to then use its indigence against it, which some news outlets still report as if its current. Legislators argue that fees will impact low-income drivers the most, while it would be mostly to low-income drivers’ benefit to swap cars for light rail or trolleys, and to everyone’s benefit to get their cars off city highways. The opposition makes no claims about the project’s actual goals. Compare San Diego’s low ridership to San Francisco’s 30%, or even Los Angeles’ 6%! Despite the worries that the government is trying to change the public’s behavior, it should be remembered that the public overwhelmingly support mass transportation. If its budget is slashed to operate as a last resort for people for people who can’t afford cars, thats who will ride it. The bottom line is, maintaining and owning cars is becoming more expensive regardless of whose in office.

   LikeLike

   Reply
5. g00dsoup says:

   April 18, 2023 at 10:12 am

   Opposition to San Diego’s public transport has long been argued by legislators, mostly conservatives in congress. As seen in Fox News’ opinion piece, large news sources desperately try to tear down public transport with the argument that the government is abusing its power to alter public behavior. Fox’s effort is aligned with a trend among public transports detractors: to routinely underfund the asset, to then use its indigence against it, which some news outlets still report as if it’s current. Legislators argue that fees will impact low-income drivers the most, while it would be mostly to low-income drivers’ benefit to swap cars for light rail or trolleys, and to everyone’s benefit to get their cars off the cities highways. The opposition makes no claims about the projects actual goals. Compare San Diego’s low ridership to San Francisco’s 30%, or even Los Angeles’ 6%! Despite the worries that the government is trying to change the public’s behavior, it should be remembered that the public overwhelmingly supports mass transportation. If its budget is slashed to operate as a last resort for people for people who can’t afford cars, that’s who will ride it. The bottom line is, maintaining and owning cars is becoming more expensive regardless of whose in office.

   LikeLike

   Reply
6. chickennugget246 says:

   April 18, 2023 at 4:19 pm

   Opposition to San Diego’s public transport has long been argued by legislators, mostly conservatives in congress. As seen in Fox News’s opinion piece, large news sources desperately try to tear down public transport with the argument that the government is abusing its power to alter public behavior. Fox’s effort is aligned with a trend among public transport’s detractors: to routinely underfund the asset, to then use its indigence against it, which some news outlets still report as if it’s current. Legislators argue that fees will impact low-income drivers the most, while it would be mostly to low-income drivers’ benefit to swap cars for light rail or trolleys, and to everyone’s benefit to get their cars off the cities’ highways. The opposition makes no claims about the project’s actual goals. Compare San Diego’s low ridership to San Francisco’s 30%, or even Los Angeles’s 6%! Despite the worries that the government is trying to change the public’s behavior, it should be remembered that the public overwhelmingly support mass transportation. If its budget is slashed to operate as a last resort for people for people who can’t afford cars, that’s who will ride it. The bottom line is, maintaining and owning cars is becoming more expensive regardless of who’s in office.

   LikeLike

   Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out /  Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out /  Change )

Cancel

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.

Δ