Rebuttal Rewrite – Lily4Pres

Brains Over Brawn

To say physicality is the overwhelming decider in athletics and sport would seem to be fairly accurate to the average spectator. However, this claim could not be farther from the truth. The truth is the mental aspect in athletic competition reigns supreme over the well perceived physical aspect of sport. Physical prowess does not make the decisions after all.

According to David J. Handelsman, author of Endocrinology: Adult and Pediatric, sport has four major dimensions. These four dimensions are skill, strength, endurance, and recovery. All four of these pertain directly to physical capabilities. Handelsman does believe concentration and strategy pertain to skill, but he did not say this was crucial in any physical sport. Rather, he connected skill being an important factor in board games, racing, and target shooting. Depressing the value that the mental aspect in sport holds. Handelsman goes on to say that that there are minimum requirements within each of these four fields that must be met to reach a respected level. What he failed to mention was after these requirements are met, the level switches at an exponential rate. After the requirements are met, what truly strengthens an athlete’s performance lies in their composure and their emotional intelligence. Daniel Goleman, from the Institute of Health and Human Potential, sees emotional intelligence as the catalyst in one’s abilities to control their emotions and take advantage of them. Those who are aware of their stress from situational pressure can take control of their emotions, using them to their advantage. Emotions precede thought, the faster the awareness of emotions is realized, the better one can control their emotions and create a better environment. A Harvard Business Review reported that 80% of competencies that differentiate top performers from others spawn from the domain of Emotional Intelligence. The mental aspect of sport is indispensable at a competitive level.

All this talk of the mental aspect of sport, let’s zone in on a real example. We will be looking at two NFL wide receivers who have unarguably reached the highest level a football player can. Football being the quintessential contact sport, physicality would seem to be the key element to success. On one side we have – weighing in at 5’10”, 186 pounds – Player A. On the other side, we have – also weighing in at 5’10”, 186 pounds – Player B. To gather their physical capabilities we must use some sort of standard testing to garner their athletic ability. All info will be from the results of the player’s respective NFL Combine, an event that tests a players physical prowess before their draft day. During their NFL Combine, certain events are key depending on the position of the player. For these two players, who are both wide receivers, the tests that are vital in their evaluation are the: 40 yard dash, 3 cone, and vertical. Each of these tests cover salient physical aspects such as their speed, agility, and jumping. Looking at the 40 yard dash first, Player A ended with a 4.56 second run. This would be in the 48th percentile of all receivers. Player B ended with a 4.40 second run, a man like lightning, 92nd percentile of all receivers. For vertical, Player A showed up with a 33.5″ jump, 36th percentile of receivers. Player B managed a 39.5″ vertical, kangaroo hops, 93rd percentile of receivers. For the agility assessment, a 3 cone drill is used. The 3 cones are spread out and the player must navigate through them following a set pattern as fast as possible. Player A achieved a 6.98 second 3 cone drill, 54th percentile of all receivers. Player B managed a 6.64 second shuttle, 96th percentile. There is no debate, using Handelsman’s criteria, that Player B certainly is the better athlete.

After looking at these numbers, it is not opinion but fact to say Player B is the better physical athlete by a wide margin. Although they both stand at a very similar stature, Player B dominated in each physical test. Not only did Player B dominate Player A, Player B was reaching all-time levels of athletic measures. Recording an immense 90th percentile in evaluated drills. It is time to unveil who the freak of nature and the below average athlete are. Player A is none other than Antonio Brown. Brown is a very well-known athlete. Playing wide receiver for numerous teams since his introduction to the league in 2010, he has been exceptional in every roster. Some even consider him to be the greatest NFL receiver of his era. 4-time first team all-pro (top 2 receiver in the league that season), has topped the century mark in yards per game 3 times in his career, and has led the league in receiving yards twice in his career. Accumulating 12000 yards in a lowly 144 games, averaging 84.5 yards per game which is 4th in NFL history. Unarguably one of the greatest to ever grace the pigskin. If these accolades were all accomplished by a mediocre receiver, athletically speaking, Player B must be the greatest football player to walk this earth. Well, that would be the case if physical ability meant that much at the top flight. Player B is Emmanuel Sanders. Being drafted in the same season as Brown, a fair analysis of their careers is applicable. In 25 more games than Brown, although starting their career at the same time, Sanders has reached a respectable 9100 yards, 54.3 yards per game. A two-time pro bowler is nothing to scoff at. Sanders has had a long, respectable career, yet he was drafted 113 picks before the superior Brown. Even with the advantage in every single physical aspect, Sanders could not clean Brown’s cleats. How did Brown manage?

The major difference in the two, outside of physical ability, is Antonio Brown’s intelligence and emotional intelligence advantage. Brown himself is an outspoken athlete who portrays definition-esque confidence. Brown has taken his confidence and shown it on Twitter numerous times; Even once claiming his then teammate, JuJu Smith-Schuster, only seemed like he played well because of him. This addition of self-confidence is no stranger to success. In The Relationship Between Anxiety and Performance: A Cognitive-Behavioral Perspective, self-confidence confidence directly leads to better performances. There is no better example than Antonio Brown. Even with the constant obstacles he faces, the frame and athletic ability he was given, he still manages to produce at levels only few could dream of. Although there are other factors that relate to performance, the minimum physical requirements are already met when playing at a high level. Leaving little room for physical improvement, the true deciding factor rests in the mental fortitude and strength of the athlete.

References

Goleman, Daniel What is emotional intelligence? IHHP.

Handelsman, David J. Endocrinology: Adult and pediatric (Seventh) Volume 1. Elsevier Saunders.

Humara, Miguel The Relationship Between Anxiety and Performance: A Cognitive-Behavioral Perspective Athletic Insight.

NFL Combine Results

This entry was posted in Lily4Pres, Rebuttal Rewrite FA21. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s