Definition Rewrite- strawberryfields4

Calories: Friend Not Foe

Most simplistically, a calorie is a unit of energy. Without energy, our bodies would cease to function. This cessation could result in the inability to run or work out, but what we often neglect to realize is that this could also result in no heartbeat or breathing. Without question, the human body requires, yes requires, energy. Since this is the case, then it is a grave disservice to society to indoctrinate the masses with the misconception that calories are bad and must be limited by everyone. Unfortunately, this is exactly what happens in public schools throughout the country.

In an earnest attempt to battle the epidemic of childhood obesity, health educators in public schools have implemented a curriculum that teaches impressionable young students the misguided notion that calories are bad for you. This overgeneralization is incredibly hazardous, and young learners need to be properly informed on the subject in order to make healthy dietary choices. 

Registered dietician, Wendy Kapsak, purports the dyer importance of understanding the concept of energy balance. This concept refers to the amount of calories required by an individual, depending upon the energy they expend through physical activity, as well as their basal metabolic rate. It is abundantly clear that this balance will be unique for everyone. Therefore, a “one size fits all” ideology regarding caloric needs is extremely dangerous and simply inaccurate. A massive confusion has been created among young people due to the irresponsible dissemination of information within schools by self-appointed “experts” in the field of health and nutrition. 

A survey conducted by the International Food Information Council revealed an overwhelming 44% of people underestimate their daily caloric needs based on their age, weight, height, and activity level. This lack of understanding develops at a young age through the advocating for a low calorie diet that occurs in classrooms. Rather than creating a negative connotation associated with calories, children must be taught about the necessity for a highly individualized calorie balance that is soundly supported by science. 

Furthermore, although many are able to comprehend that food provides fuel for the body, there is still a disconnect in the understanding of the correlation between calories and expended energy in this equation. In Why Calories Count: From Science to Politics, the authors explain the metabolic function of how the body converts calories to energy. “Metabolism is the term given to the entire process of using the molecules in the food you eat to maintain your basic functions, build new molecules characteristic of your own body, use your muscles, and produce energy.” Encouraging young people to limit the quantity of calories they consume is ultimately encouraging them to deprive their bodies of much needed energy. Students need to learn how to properly evaluate their caloric needs based on the many factors that contribute to their individual metabolic functions.

Undeniably, there are overweight individuals who may benefit from eating in a calorie deficit. Educators do not fail to consistently emphasize this fact. However, a balanced health education curriculum should not only address the science behind what happens when an excessive amount of calories are consumed, creating a surplus in relation to the calorie balance. At the same time, it is equally important that they recognize that it is not a universal need among every growing child to restrict calories. In fact, there is an ever growing population of children at risk of serious health complications due to an inadequate caloric intake. This is simply not properly addressed in health education classrooms. 

A more appropriate alternative for nutrition education is to focus on the benefits that various food products can contribute to a well balanced diet. Adam Drewnowski explains how nutrient profiling has been used for years to identify nutrient dense foods. This profiling system does not villainize foods that society considers to be high calorie, but rather praises foods that are a rich source of healthful vitamins and minerals. For example, avocados and nuts contain more calories than other food options, yet are dense in some of the most essential nutrients and healthy fats. Conversely, a sugar free soft drink, such as Diet Coke, contains zero calories, but has no nutritional value whatsoever. This strongly contradicts the lessons that are representative of the health education curriculums nationwide. Teaching practices would be better focused on information related to nutrition density in order to aid students in making healthy and balanced dietary decisions. 

The term balance must also be emphasized to the vulnerable young minds in the classroom. The concept “all foods fit” is a mindset that is paramount for today’s youth to adopt, as our diet obsessed society continues to thrive on disordered eating behaviors. Health instructors must make it clear that it is normal, healthy, and acceptable for an individual’s diet to contain a balance of nutrient rich foods, while also incorporating foods that are simply enjoyable, such as sweet treats. Moreover, referring to foods as “good” or “bad” further perpetuates the vicious mindset that distorts one’s perception of how to fuel their body and encourages individuals to buy into unhealthy habits. 

The fact remains that health teachers are not registered dietitians, nor do they have medical degrees. While they may be capable of teaching children basic and necessary health lessons such as the dangers of smoking and drug use, they are not qualified to advise children on a subject that should be discussed with their medical care provider. Nutritional needs are unique to each individual and teaching universal eating habits is wildly irresponsible, particularly during the impressionable informative years of a child’s schooling. Additionally, carelessly interfering with children’s diets at a time when their bodies are rapidly developing can potentially cause irrevocable harm. Alternately, what instructors can do is instill concepts of dietary balance and nutritional value in foods that extend far beyond calorie count. Only then will the educational system in our country be responsibly educating children on the true function of calories and their place in a healthy, well-rounded diet.  

References

 Drewnowski, A., & Fulgoni, V. (2008). Nutrient profiling of foods: creating a nutrient-rich food index Nutrition Reviews, 66(1), 23–39. 

Kapsak, W. R., DiMarco-Crook, C., Hill, J. O., Toner, C. D., & Edge, M. S. (2013). Confusion on All Sides of the Calorie Equation: Lessons… : Nutrition Today Nutrition Today (Annapolis), 48(5), 195–202. 

Nestle, M., & Nesheim, M. (2012). Why calories count : From science to politics. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

This entry was posted in Definition Rewrite FA21, Portfolio StrawberryFields, StrawberryFields. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Definition Rewrite- strawberryfields4

  1. davidbdale says:

    Honestly? A food writer with an opinion about calories named Nestle?

    Like

  2. davidbdale says:

    I’m surprised that in your first reference, Nutrition Reviews isn’t italicized. It’s the publication, so it should be.

    The reason I checked is that I first noticed that “Why Calories Count . . . ” is not italicized either. It appears to be a book, and therefore, also italicize-able. Did a reference generator steer you wrong? You italicize it yourself in your paragraph, so I know you’re aware of the rule.

    It’s not a BIG DEAL, but curious readers such as me are thrown when getting bad clues about sources from your Reference list.

    Like

  3. davidbdale says:

    You’re doing good work here, Fields, which I can tell from the briefest scan, but I want to make some observations on your first paragraph that I hope will be helpful not to fix your sentences but to raise your awareness of how carefully people read and how easily we are confused.

    I wouldn’t try this so early with a poor writer, so consider these notes a compliment. I find that EDITING sentences creates LOVE for those sentences and LOVING SENTENCES makes it harder to later KILL THOSE SENTENCES when they outlive their usefulness. So, don’t fall in love too soon. Here we go:

    Most simplistically defined, a calorie is a unit of energy.

    —Redundant. Simplistically is simplistic enough.

    Without energy, our bodies would cease to function.

    —Nice.

    Obviously, this could mean no running or working out, but what many individuals neglect to realize is that it could also mean no heartbeat or breathing.

    —If it’s not obvious, explain why not. If it’s obvious, you don’t need to say so.
    —Your “this could mean” has no clear antecedent. Does it refer to the cessation of functionality? Or does it refer to the function? That sounds crazy, but bear with me.
    —When we read “this could mean no running,” we think we’ve read a typo. You must mean “ceasing to function” means “failure to run or work.” The author means that without energy the body does not run well (operate well, work well).
    —You are in danger of creating a breach between yourself and your readers. Those “many individuals” are readers not as wise as you who need your wisdom. You don’t want to sound like that guy. So back off a little. Be one with your reader: What many of us fail to consider . . . .
    —By the end of the sentence, we know what you meant by “this could mean no running.” It means, without energy, we wouldn’t be able to run track, or run around the block. But you could have made the understanding easier.

    Without question, the human body requires, yes requires, energy.

    —You said this once. Then pointed out that it was obvious. Now you’re telling us a third time as if we were still questioning.

    It has already been established that a calorie is a unit of energy.

    —And now, sort of, you’re telling us again that you’ve already told us.

    If this is the case,

    —And then, as if you were still trying to convince YOURSELF, you toss in the doubt; “IF this is the case.”

    then it is a grave disservice to society to indoctrinate the masses with the misconception that calories are bad and must be limited by everyone.

    —Nice. Bold. Categorical. Picks the right enemy (not your reader).

    Unfortunately, this is exactly what happens in public schools throughout the country.

    —Go get ’em!

    I need to know if this is too over-the-top for you, Fields. I will do it again unless you tell me you’re sure enough of your abilities to NOT feel defensive about critiques.

    AND I understand this is a first draft AND that I told you in class I expected it to be rough. So you don’t have to worry that I think it’s the best you can do. I know it’s not. I just want to help you find your best voice. Respond, please. 🙂

    Like

    • strawberryfields4 says:

      Thank you so much for your feedback. I do not feel defensive and always appreciate the help. I will consider your comments and make revisions over the next few days. Also, I will fix that error in my references section 🙂

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s