Visual Rewrite- cfa lover

Posted on October 19, 2021 by cfalover

0:01-0:03

A pair of lungs is introduced. They seem to be pink and full, like healthy lungs. The lungs are in the darkness though.. possibly meaning something bad is happening/has happened to them. As they come closer in this frame, they seem to have little fibers coming off of them; the pair is made of these fibers. Finally, as the lungs are as close as they can be to the camera, we are shown that the lungs are made of matches. The director probably has done this to later show how smoking can be damaging to your lungs.

0:04-0:06

Now we see that the matches have been lit and they are on fire, spreading one by one on the entirety of the lungs. The camera zooms in on each burning part to show how it is spreading. I believe, once again, that the director has done this to show us how smoking can kill our lungs and permanently damage them.

0:07-0:09

The camera zooms out to show the burning lungs as a whole. The sides of the once healthy lungs are continuing to go up in flames and the fire burns brighter and bigger as the seconds go on. This tells us that even just lighting one match will begin a rapidly spreading fire (rapidly spreading lung disease or even lung cancer, as the director, I think, wants to show the audience).

0:11-0:12

The camera now zooms in to on top of the lungs, and the lungs are now entirely up in flames. They are now not a pink/neutral color like they were to start, but a black coloring from the fire. It’s hard to believe that lungs can deteriorate that quickly just from lighting one match.. but this director wants his audience to really SEE this damage.

0:13-0:14

We begin to see the matches fall off of the lungs to the ground, one by one. The lungs are quickly deteriorating from the fire started, and the lungs will soon probably turn to black.

0:15-0:19

The damaged lungs have now turned into the healthy lungs with matches that we witnessed in the first few frames on the video. They are not on fire, but still made of matches. The lighting in the background has lightened; we see a white room with two windows on the left side. There is no furniture, people, or anything to be seen besides the lungs in the center of the frame with the room shown in the background. Will the director show people with lung disease? Or maybe a doctor will appear?

0:20

The lungs have one match lit, but it goes out fairly quickly. The lungs are brought closer into the frame, and the lighting of the background becomes extremely bright. The lungs are still back to how they looked in the beginning of the video.

0:21-0:23

The director removes the lungs from the frame, and we now see a machine. It looks like an MRI machine, and there is a door in the back of the room. I think the director is showing that it is important to get screened for lung disease if you are smoking, or around anything that can damage your lungs.

0:24-0:30

The director zooms on in the MRI machine, or scanning machine in other words, and comes up with text saying “Savedbythescan.org”. Clearly, we now know that his or her intentions were to show how damaging smoking can be to your lungs, but also to get scanned regularly to check for lung disease and lung cancer. Lung cancer can occur in people who smoke frequently, and can grow very quickly as well. This is especially for if you are high-risk on top of smoking. Showing the matches burn and fall off of the lungs may scare people into taking better care of their bodies and forming more healthy habits.

video link : Lung Cancer Screening

Posted in Visual Rewrite | Leave a comment

Visual – cfalover

Posted on October 19, 2021 by cfalover

0:01-0:03

A pair of lungs is introduced. They seem to be pink and full, like healthy lungs. The lungs are in the darkness though.. possibly meaning something bad is happening/has happened to them. As they come closer in this frame, they seem to have little fibers coming off of them; the pair is made of these fibers. Finally, as the lungs are as close as they can be to the camera, we are shown that the lungs are made of matches. The director probably has done this to later show how smoking can be damaging to your lungs.

0:04-0:06

Now we see that the matches have been lit and they are on fire, spreading one by one on the entirety of the lungs. The camera zooms in on each burning part to show how it is spreading. I believe, once again, that the director has done this to show us how smoking can kill our lungs and permanently damage them.

0:07-0:09

The camera zooms out to show the burning lungs as a whole. The sides of the once healthy lungs are continuing to go up in flames and the fire burns brighter and bigger as the seconds go on. This tells us that even just lighting one match will begin a rapidly spreading fire (rapidly spreading lung disease or even lung cancer, as the director, I think, wants to show the audience).

0:11-0:12

The camera now zooms in to on top of the lungs, and the lungs are now entirely up in flames. They are now not a pink/neutral color like they were to start, but a black coloring from the fire. It’s hard to believe that lungs can deteriorate that quickly just from lighting one match.. but this director wants his audience to really SEE this damage.

0:13-0:14

We begin to see the matches fall off of the lungs to the ground, one by one. The lungs are quickly deteriorating from the fire started, and the lungs will soon probably turn to black.

0:15-0:19

The damaged lungs have now turned into the healthy lungs with matches that we witnessed in the first few frames on the video. They are not on fire, but still made of matches. The lighting in the background has lightened; we see a white room with two windows on the left side. There is no furniture, people, or anything to be seen besides the lungs in the center of the frame with the room shown in the background. Will the director show people with lung disease? Or maybe a doctor will appear?

0:20

The lungs have one match lit, but it goes out fairly quickly. The lungs are brought closer into the frame, and the lighting of the background becomes extremely bright. The lungs are still back to how they looked in the beginning of the video.

0:21-0:23

The director removes the lungs from the frame, and we now see a machine. It looks like an MRI machine, and there is a door in the back of the room. I think the director is showing that it is important to get screened for lung disease if you are smoking, or around anything that can damage your lungs.

0:24-0:30

The director zooms on in the MRI machine, or scanning machine in other words, and comes up with text saying “Savedbythescan.org”. Clearly, we now know that his or her intentions were to show how damaging smoking can be to your lungs, but also to get scanned regularly to check for lung disease and lung cancer. Lung cancer can occur in people who smoke frequently, and can grow very quickly as well. This is especially for if you are high-risk on top of smoking. Showing the matches burn and fall off of the lungs may scare people into taking better care of their bodies and forming more healthy habits.

video link : Lung Cancer Screening

Posted in Visual Rewrite | Leave a comment

Definition Rewrite- strawberryfields4

Posted on October 19, 2021 by strawberryfields4

Calories: Friend Not Foe

Most simplistically, a calorie is a unit of energy. Without energy, our bodies would cease to function. This cessation could result in the inability to run or work out, but what we often neglect to realize is that this could also result in no heartbeat or breathing. Without question, the human body requires, yes requires, energy. Since this is the case, then it is a grave disservice to society to indoctrinate the masses with the misconception that calories are bad and must be limited by everyone. Unfortunately, this is exactly what happens in public schools throughout the country.

In an earnest attempt to battle the epidemic of childhood obesity, health educators in public schools have implemented a curriculum that teaches impressionable young students the misguided notion that calories are bad for you. This overgeneralization is incredibly hazardous, and young learners need to be properly informed on the subject in order to make healthy dietary choices. 

Registered dietician, Wendy Kapsak, purports the dyer importance of understanding the concept of energy balance. This concept refers to the amount of calories required by an individual, depending upon the energy they expend through physical activity, as well as their basal metabolic rate. It is abundantly clear that this balance will be unique for everyone. Therefore, a “one size fits all” ideology regarding caloric needs is extremely dangerous and simply inaccurate. A massive confusion has been created among young people due to the irresponsible dissemination of information within schools by self-appointed “experts” in the field of health and nutrition. 

A survey conducted by the International Food Information Council revealed an overwhelming 44% of people underestimate their daily caloric needs based on their age, weight, height, and activity level. This lack of understanding develops at a young age through the advocating for a low calorie diet that occurs in classrooms. Rather than creating a negative connotation associated with calories, children must be taught about the necessity for a highly individualized calorie balance that is soundly supported by science. 

Furthermore, although many are able to comprehend that food provides fuel for the body, there is still a disconnect in the understanding of the correlation between calories and expended energy in this equation. In Why Calories Count: From Science to Politics, the authors explain the metabolic function of how the body converts calories to energy. “Metabolism is the term given to the entire process of using the molecules in the food you eat to maintain your basic functions, build new molecules characteristic of your own body, use your muscles, and produce energy.” Encouraging young people to limit the quantity of calories they consume is ultimately encouraging them to deprive their bodies of much needed energy. Students need to learn how to properly evaluate their caloric needs based on the many factors that contribute to their individual metabolic functions.

Undeniably, there are overweight individuals who may benefit from eating in a calorie deficit. Educators do not fail to consistently emphasize this fact. However, a balanced health education curriculum should not only address the science behind what happens when an excessive amount of calories are consumed, creating a surplus in relation to the calorie balance. At the same time, it is equally important that they recognize that it is not a universal need among every growing child to restrict calories. In fact, there is an ever growing population of children at risk of serious health complications due to an inadequate caloric intake. This is simply not properly addressed in health education classrooms. 

A more appropriate alternative for nutrition education is to focus on the benefits that various food products can contribute to a well balanced diet. Adam Drewnowski explains how nutrient profiling has been used for years to identify nutrient dense foods. This profiling system does not villainize foods that society considers to be high calorie, but rather praises foods that are a rich source of healthful vitamins and minerals. For example, avocados and nuts contain more calories than other food options, yet are dense in some of the most essential nutrients and healthy fats. Conversely, a sugar free soft drink, such as Diet Coke, contains zero calories, but has no nutritional value whatsoever. This strongly contradicts the lessons that are representative of the health education curriculums nationwide. Teaching practices would be better focused on information related to nutrition density in order to aid students in making healthy and balanced dietary decisions. 

The term balance must also be emphasized to the vulnerable young minds in the classroom. The concept “all foods fit” is a mindset that is paramount for today’s youth to adopt, as our diet obsessed society continues to thrive on disordered eating behaviors. Health instructors must make it clear that it is normal, healthy, and acceptable for an individual’s diet to contain a balance of nutrient rich foods, while also incorporating foods that are simply enjoyable, such as sweet treats. Moreover, referring to foods as “good” or “bad” further perpetuates the vicious mindset that distorts one’s perception of how to fuel their body and encourages individuals to buy into unhealthy habits. 

The fact remains that health teachers are not registered dietitians, nor do they have medical degrees. While they may be capable of teaching children basic and necessary health lessons such as the dangers of smoking and drug use, they are not qualified to advise children on a subject that should be discussed with their medical care provider. Nutritional needs are unique to each individual and teaching universal eating habits is wildly irresponsible, particularly during the impressionable informative years of a child’s schooling. Additionally, carelessly interfering with children’s diets at a time when their bodies are rapidly developing can potentially cause irrevocable harm. Alternately, what instructors can do is instill concepts of dietary balance and nutritional value in foods that extend far beyond calorie count. Only then will the educational system in our country be responsibly educating children on the true function of calories and their place in a healthy, well-rounded diet.  

References

 Drewnowski, A., & Fulgoni, V. (2008). Nutrient profiling of foods: creating a nutrient-rich food index Nutrition Reviews, 66(1), 23–39. 

Kapsak, W. R., DiMarco-Crook, C., Hill, J. O., Toner, C. D., & Edge, M. S. (2013). Confusion on All Sides of the Calorie Equation: Lessons… : Nutrition Today Nutrition Today (Annapolis), 48(5), 195–202. 

Nestle, M., & Nesheim, M. (2012). Why calories count : From science to politics. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

Posted in Definition Rewrite | 4 Comments

How to Write a Good Ransom Note

Posted on October 19, 2021 by tyblicky2001

The first ransom note had me confused and caused me to misread the paragraph. I was confused on the purpose of the note. I figured it was just informing me on something. But, when I read the next note, I understood the message and the details were specific. Clear message.

Posted in You Forgot to Categorize! | Leave a comment

Definition Rewrite—davidbdale

Posted on October 19, 2021 by davidbdale

Another Brilliant Title

All revisions go into this post, not the Definition post. All revisions go into this post, not the Definition post. All revisions go into this post, not the Definition post. All revisions go into this post, not the Definition post. All revisions go into this post, not the Definition post. All revisions go into this post, not the Definition post. All revisions go into this post, not the Definition post. All revisions go into this post, not the Definition post. All revisions go into this post, not the Definition post.

Posted in davidbdale, Definition Rewrite | Leave a comment

Definition—davidbdale

Posted on October 19, 2021 by davidbdale

Brilliant Title

Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text. Boilerplate definition text.

Posted in Definition | Leave a comment

Won’t You Be My Wireless Neighbor?

Posted on October 19, 2021 by davidbdale

Won’t You Be My Wireless Neighbor?

By Helen Rubinstein

I contend this is largely a Definition/Categorical argument. As you read it, decide for yourself 1) what it defines and 2) to what degree you believe this is in fact a Definition argument. 25%? 50%? More or less? Leave your analysis as a Reply below.

FOR a long time, I relied on my Brooklyn neighbors’ generosity—that is, their unsecured wireless networks—every time I connected to the Web.

So, to linksys of Park Slope, in 2005, for allowing me to do my first freelance work from home; to Netgear 1 and Netgear 2 of the same neighborhood, in 2006, for supporting my electronic application to several graduate schools; to DHoffma, from 2007 to 2008, for letting me pay my taxes online and stream new episodes of “Friday Night Lights” each evening for a whole winter; to belkin54g, Cooley and, above all, to the blessed Belkin_G-Plus_MIMO of Ditmas Park, from 2009 to 2010, for the ability to speedily reply to student e-mails, video-chat with my sister, keep abreast of the latest literary hoo-ha, “like” as many of my friends’ Facebook posts as I liked and learn all about lentil-sprouting or Prometheus whenever the mood struck: Thank you. And may you rest in peace.

A few months ago, the Belkin_G-Plus_MIMO network changed its name and gained a padlock icon in my computer’s list of available connections. Then—crickets. The era of unintentional, unasked-for or simply unacknowledged Internet sharing, it seemed, had come to an end.

Suddenly disconnected, I realized how lucky I’d been all those years, having that tremendous body of information and awesome communication technology at my fingertips, all basically free. It may have been unfair, but I don’t believe I was stealing: the owners’ leaving their networks password-free was essentially a gift, an ethereal gesture of kindness. Sometimes I’d imagine my anonymous benefactors, those people behind Netgear 1 or belkin54g, thinking, “Well, I have Internet to spare.”

And, really, who doesn’t? Home wireless networks can usually support five or more computers, yet there are only about 1.4 computers per American household.

For a few blindered weeks, I debated whether or not to finally “buy” the Internet. The whole system, though, seemed wasteful: paying a company to come wire my apartment, then paying a monthly fee so that I could maintain my own private territory within the cloud of 20 or so wireless networks that were already humming around my apartment. It would be all the more wasteful given the likelihood that, just as cellphones made landlines optional, smartphones and tablets will soon replace the need for home networks at all.

Why couldn’t I instead shell out a nominal fee—to someone, anyone—to partake of the riches that were all around me in abundance?

Paying for Internet access, after all, isn’t like paying for cable TV, where cable providers pay cable networks in turn. My establishing a new network instead of sharing with neighbors does nothing to benefit the Web sites whose content benefits me and whose value to advertisers is based on views and visits.

Nor is it like paying for phone service, where the physical object that makes and receives calls is inseparable from your unique number. My e-mail address is utterly portable: it’s not bound to an I.P. address or one computer—and, like the vast majority of the Internet’s services and information, it’s free.

Which is part of why getting online free felt so natural. During my Internet-less weeks, in desperate moments, I checked e-mail on my Kindle’s wireless connection, which is complimentary (to encourage e-book purchases). But that was a painfully slow experience akin to surfing the Web on an Etch a Sketch.

In an ideal world, the Internet would be universally available to anyone able to receive it. Promisingly, the Federal Communications Commission in September announced that it would open up unused analog airwaves for high-speed public wireless use, which could lead to gratis hotspots spreading across cities and through many rural areas.

But an Internet as freely obtainable as broadcast TV hasn’t yet arrived. And so I recently found myself watching as a technician strung a wire from a tall pole in the backyard to my third-floor apartment so I could have my own connection (wired, to ease myself into the world of paid Internet). It was a process that took nearly three hours, and meant the addition of another long cable to the fistful already circling the building.

When he finished, I had to ask: “Shouldn’t this all be wireless? Wouldn’t that be much easier?”

“Too much interference,” he said. “Too many networks affect the signal.” I thought again about all the people close by with all their overlapping networks.

Perhaps the solution is a simple, old-fashioned gesture. Just knock on a neighbor’s door, and ask if she might be able to spare some wireless.

Helen Rubinstein teaches writing at Brooklyn College.

Posted in Required Reading | 39 Comments

Definition- strawberryfields4

Posted on October 17, 2021 by strawberryfields4

Calories: Friend Not Foe

Most simplistically defined, a calorie is a unit of energy. Without energy, our bodies would cease to function. Obviously, this could mean no running or working out, but what many individuals neglect to realize is that it could also mean no heartbeat or breathing. Without question, the human body requires, yes requires, energy. It has already been established that a calorie is a unit of energy. If this is the case, then it is a grave disservice to society to indoctrinate the masses with the misconception that calories are bad and must be limited by everyone. Unfortunately, this is exactly what happens in public schools throughout the country.

In an earnest attempt to battle the epidemic of childhood obesity, health educators in public schools have implemented a curriculum that teaches impressionable young students the misguided notion that calories are bad for you. This overgeneralization is incredibly hazardous, and young learners need to be properly informed on the subject in order to make healthy dietary choices. 

Registered dietician, Wendy Kapsak, purports the dyer importance of understanding the concept of energy balance. This concept refers to the amount of calories required by an individual, depending upon the energy they expend through physical activity, as well as their basal metabolic rate. It is abundantly clear that this balance will be unique for everyone. Therefore, a “one size fits all” ideology regarding caloric needs is extremely dangerous and simply inaccurate. A massive confusion has been created among young people due to the irresponsible dissemination of information within schools by self-appointed “experts” in the field of health and nutrition. 

A survey conducted by the International Food Information Council revealed an overwhelming 44% of people underestimate their daily caloric needs based on their age, weight, height, and activity level. This lack of understanding develops at a young age through the advocating for a low calorie diet that occurs in classrooms. Rather than creating a negative connotation associated with calories, children must be taught about the necessity for a highly individualized calorie balance that is soundly supported by science. 

Furthermore, although many are able to comprehend that food provides fuel for the body, there is still a disconnect in the understanding of the correlation between calories and expended energy in this equation. In Why Calories Count: From Science to Politics, the authors explain the metabolic function of how the body converts calories to energy. “Metabolism is the term given to the entire process of using the molecules in the food you eat to maintain your basic functions, build new molecules characteristic of your own body, use your muscles, and produce energy.” Encouraging young people to limit the quantity of calories they consume is ultimately encouraging them to deprive their bodies of much needed energy. Students need to learn how to properly evaluate their caloric needs based on the many factors that contribute to their individual metabolic functions.

Undeniably, there are overweight individuals who may benefit from eating in a calorie deficit. Educators do not fail to consistently emphasize this fact. However, a balanced health education curriculum should not only address the science behind what happens when an excessive amount of calories are consumed, creating a surplus in relation to the calorie balance. At the same time, it is equally important that they recognize that it is not a universal need among every growing child to restrict calories. In fact, there is an ever growing population of children at risk of serious health complications due to an inadequate caloric intake. This is simply not properly addressed in health education classrooms. 

A more appropriate alternative for nutrition education is to focus on the benefits that various food products can contribute to a well balanced diet. Adam Drewnowski explains how nutrient profiling has been used for years to identify nutrient dense foods. This profiling system does not villainize foods that society considers to be high calorie, but rather praises foods that are a rich source of healthful vitamins and minerals. For example, avocados and nuts contain more calories than other food options, yet are dense in some of the most essential nutrients and healthy fats. Conversely, a sugar free soft drink, such as Diet Coke, contains zero calories, but has no nutritional value whatsoever. This strongly contradicts the lessons that are representative of the health education curriculums nationwide. Teaching practices would be better focused on information related to nutrition density in order to aid students in making healthy and balanced dietary decisions. 

The term balance must also be emphasized to the vulnerable young minds in the classroom. The concept “all foods fit” is a mindset that is paramount for today’s youth to adopt, as our diet obsessed society continues to thrive on disordered eating behaviors. Health instructors must make it clear that it is normal, healthy, and acceptable for an individual’s diet to contain a balance of nutrient rich foods, while also incorporating foods that are simply enjoyable, such as sweet treats. Moreover, referring to foods as “good” or “bad” further perpetuates the vicious mindset that distorts one’s perception of how to fuel their body and encourages individuals to buy into unhealthy habits. 

The fact remains that health teachers are not registered dietitians, nor do they have medical degrees. While they may be capable of teaching children basic and necessary health lessons such as the dangers of smoking and drug use, they are not qualified to advise children on a subject that should be discussed with their medical care provider. Nutritional needs are unique to each individual and teaching universal eating habits is wildly irresponsible, particularly during the impressionable informative years of a child’s schooling. Additionally, carelessly interfering with children’s diets at a time when their bodies are rapidly developing can potentially cause irrevocable harm. Alternately, what instructors can do is instill concepts of dietary balance and nutritional value in foods that extend far beyond calorie count. Only then will the educational system in our country be responsibly educating children on the true function of calories and their place in a healthy, well-rounded diet.  

References

 Drewnowski, A., & Fulgoni, V. (2008). Nutrient profiling of foods: creating a nutrient-rich food index Nutrition Reviews, 66(1), 23–39. 

Kapsak, W. R., DiMarco-Crook, C., Hill, J. O., Toner, C. D., & Edge, M. S. (2013). Confusion on All Sides of the Calorie Equation: Lessons… : Nutrition Today Nutrition Today (Annapolis), 48(5), 195–202. 

Nestle, M., & Nesheim, M. (2012). Why calories count : From science to politics. ProQuest Ebook Central https://ebookcentral.proquest.com

Posted in You Forgot to Categorize! | Leave a comment

white page paper -eagles21

Posted on October 14, 2021 by eagles21

sal palaontino how football explains america goes into fine art detail. The cause of inury and how to prevent these injuries is very important. Properly written in a format where taught fundamentals and omniscient view of the culture of football. The meaning to explain the broad view of not only head trauma but explain how mechanics can be properly adjusted to the viewers and perfomers best interests.

Hypothesis :jounalism and how it changes safety

Journalism can intensify the terrors of safety proclaiming how and what must be fixed. Which is important in everyday writing to explain the fears of the sport. How to fix it with numbers and break down how to prevent injuries such as neck pain, vertigo, Diplopia, pupil size, attention problems, and cranial nerve symptoms.

Ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/Pmc3438866

Not all football players have the same symptoms

Ncbi.nlmnih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc3438866

Hypothesis:preventing concussions

Not all concussions are preventable but they sure can be withheld or withstanding. Most of them through preperation and opportunity can be prevented. The nfl over the past couple years has made it possible to prevent this. Also in younger athletes has been more studied for safety of these individuals. Many of this research up until 2007 made it easier for football players to be safer dueto studies. Fourteen years later many athletes have felt a lot more safe after lacing up their shoes.

Hypthesis:Equal rights

elimating the bunch of onside kicking formation is a great indicator of stopping clusters of uncomfortable athletes. This creates seperation for more mobile and preventable injuries. The value of each position and where each player is positioned on field helps prevent injuries. This is because of the mindset of the individual helps them create a representation thats clear as to where they should be on field at which time. Many times equal rights come from knowing your position. This is due to behavioral aspects of knowing your role on the field in football. Same goes with any job or sport to prevent injuries.

hypothesis:new movements

The improvement of nfl all starts with being informed as the viewer. Converying the message and allowing the spirt to improve. Many years the past 14 years has allowed such a great course to be initially constructed or discussed. Sports health illustrates football pads and helmets are still improving the wellbeing of these athletes. Numerous studies funded and unfunded have situated such results. To further the well being the sport must be well understood and well refeered.

hypthesis:change

over years many football from state to state has been improved financially. Well suited players around the league to financially support themselves. Many athletes pursued dreams of becoming these athletes. Moving forward the more we do for the character of these athletes the more we will see results to obtain less injuries. Football being a heavy proclaimer of why we see much of society struggling. The understanding of this will prevent health risks and create less hostile environments. Sticking to a humble career or just staying involved to maintain a healthy lifestyle. This is very important in todays society of becoming the people we would like and maintaining a healthy choice.

pigskinsbooks.com/2019/08/12 by shane richmond august 12,2019 available amazon u.s . amazon uk

Hypthesis :symptoms visible

players being held out on play longer to prevent longer lasting injuries. The more we take precaution thr faster it is to keep concussions from becoming worse. The feature looks on a persons face will be seen by evaluator to determine such a preventable case. Dinged, dazed ,stunned, woozy, foggy , amnemic , rendered unconsciousness individuals may be able to prevent longer lasting injuries by being brought to awareness.

how football explains america…

physiologically football molds an everyday understanding of building a career . we value our thoughts and become adjustingly suitable for such norms. We also become agriculturally fit over time for such field in this regard the nfl. We also grasp the concept of eventually morally or physically fit to suite our own minds. The drive the want such a career can be a suitable fit to understanding how football explains america.

reasoning: to value such a field builds character . Quite like becoming a doctor , pharmacist , nurse ,lawyer or school teacher. The advantages to suit the best path possible d creatmng a safe and well suited path for ourselves. Anything you set your mind to is possible. This is why i think football is agreat sports and explains america to a concise very well. We adapt to the cause and become more suitable for the sport. Nevertheless any career can be changed to suit the common needs of our people. Never lose faith and team sports will economically, financially , and analytically grow. Over he course comparitive to most sports football is most dangerous and can be more safe. Understanding Cause and prevention is very important to no longer allow such thing .

Posted in You Forgot to Categorize! | Leave a comment

eagles21

Posted on October 14, 2021 by eagles21

my hypothesis for white page paper

ow football explains america and parphrasing the viewpoint starting with sal pal

Posted in You Forgot to Categorize! | Leave a comment