PTSD Claims – InspireAngels

Section 22

People around her think she needs a break, needs to rest, to take care of herself. “I know I’m not responsible for all these people,” Brannan says. “But at the same time, nobody else is, either.”

This quote from the article is an attributive claim since the authors takes Brannan says, using her quote to make a claim. While Brannan makes a evaluative claim since she claims that she is not responsible for people.

With a half million disability cases stuck in a VA backlog, and an estimated 25 percent of Iraq/Afghanistan troops with PTSD not seeking treatment, her logic isn’t entirely off. 

In this section, this is a numerical and evaluative claim. The author states the number of disability cases in the VA backlog and gives us an estimate percent of Iran and Afghanistan troops that have untreated PTSD. This evaluative claim because the author uses these numbers to back up his logic.

And the vet who got fired from his job for being unstable and is now homeless, like 13,000 other vets under 30, who now lives with his wife and teenager in his car.

The author writes a causal, numerical, and evaluative claim. Causal claim because veterans are now homeless since they been fired from their job for being unstable. Numerical since the author mentions that 13,000 veterans under the age 30 are also getting fired from their jobs and becoming homeless. Evaluative because the author argues veterans who get fired from their job will end up living with his wife and teenager in his car.

They will hang in there until the last dog is dead,” Danna told me of military spouses. She saw her husband through peripheral neuropathy, PTSD, prison, Agent Orange-linked disease, saw her son suffer living with a ball of anxiety and succumbing to drugs, and she doesn’t regret one day.

This is an illustrative and attributive claim because the author describes Danna’s experience in staying to help her husband and son that were suffering mental illness as they will hang in there until the last dog is dead. The author is referring that the mother will stick until the end to help her family even when it gets bad. He describe Danna’s experience and her family of distress in a way to evoke sympathy. This an attributive claim because the author takes a quote said by Danna since he is passing along someone else claim.

To the sound of the running washing machine, the ‘thump, thump, thump’ of tennis shoes in the dryer, and the not so romantic smell of the kitty litter box, he held me for a moment and rocked me back and forth…and we danced. It lasted maybe 30 seconds…a brief moment in the middle of a chaotic day and a difficult week…but a brief moment that I’ve stored in my heart. A light in the darkness.”

In this last section, the author writes an illustrative, attributive, analogy claim. This is an illustrative claim because the Brannan illustrate an experience she had that maybe not have been a typical romantic thing but a brief moment that I’ve stored in my heart. This experience evokes ease and comfort to the audience. This was an analogy claim because at the end, this experience she had with her husband is compare to a light in the darkness. A good moment that occur in her usual chaotic messy daily life. This is an attributive since the author isn’t making this claim but is passing along this claim of Brannan’s experience with her husband.

Posted in InspireAngels, PTSD Claims | 6 Comments

Claims- Rowanluver29

For the PTSD Claims Assignment, I was assigned section 17. Below are going to be quotes from that section and what claims they would be classified as:

  1. “And then she’ll just sit and listen while he says he cannot get it out of his head, about how if he had caught that fucking sniper, that enemy sniper he’d been trying to get, that’d been following them around, terrorizing their unit, if he’d have managed to kill him like he was supposed to, then the sniper wouldn’t have gotten off the shot that killed his buddy.”

This quote would be classified as a casual claim. A casual claim is an assertion of cause and effect or consequences that will occur under certain circumstances. In this case, Caleb is discussing how if he had caught a sniper, he could have saved his friends life, which is cause and effect. And the consequence of him not doing so, was him losing his friend in the battle.

  • “So tonight, six years after Caleb’s service ended, Brannan is cautiously optimistic but ready for anything on Lasagna Night.”

This quote would be described as a numerical claim because it is describing the number of years that has passed relating to Caleb’s service. This quote can also be described as a comparative claim. This is because they are comparing Caleb 6 years ago to how Brennan now feels about Lasagna night, implying that the two correlate, which can also make it an analogy claim because the author is claiming something from one thing to another.

  • “It’s April at the moment. But: “He’s processin’ somethin’ right now.”

This quote would be an attributive claim. This is because the author is putting in quotes what Caleb said, instead of saying it with a sense of confidence like other times in the section. This is showing the audience that Caleb said it and the author is not really sure what to believe, or shows that they do not know what he is processing.

  • ‘“Daddy will be really happy,” she told the German shepherd sitting on her kitchen floor. “Of course, he’s too cranky to be happy about anything, and he’ll be mad because Katie won’t eat it because I spent all day makin’ it and the only thing, she wants to eat right now is pancakes.”’

This quote would again be represented as a casual claim because it is predicting what will happen under certain circumstances. In this case she is describing how Caleb will be as happy as he can be about lasagna night considering he is cranky all the time. And also how he will be mad Katie won’t eat the lasagna.

  • “These are supposed to be her easy months, she sighs, April and May and June, before the anniversaries of his worst firefights—many of them in Ramadi; a lot of bad things happened in Ramadi—exacerbate his flashbacks and nightmares.

This quote can be an illustrative claim. This type of claim is supposed to make the audience feel some sort of empathy when reading the passage. In this case the audience would feel a sort of empathy because the author is describing how Caleb had experienced a lot of hard and traumatic things in Ramadi

Posted in PTSD Claims, RowanLuver | 1 Comment

Claims – Fulcrum66

“She also helps thousands of other people” – This is a numerical claim because the statement uses a number and claims she helps that certain number of people. 

“To help find your way, find the information you need and find a way not only to cope with life after combat…but to survive and thrive.” – This is a recommendation claim because the statement offers various solutions for help and can be directed toward people looking for help. The statement is also a categorical claim because it is a list of what the people who are trying to help have to offer. 

“Caleb was edgy, distant, but he did not forget entire conversations minutes later, did not have to wait for a stable mental-health day and good moment between medication doses to be intimate with his wife, and then when he finally tried, pray to Christ for one of the times when it’s good sex, not one of the times when a car door slams outside and triggers him, or the emotion becomes so unbearable that he freezes, gets up, and walks wordlessly out the door.” – This entire statement is a categorical claim because it lists the symptoms Caleb had after his second  tour.

“All that didn’t happen until after the second tour.”- This would be a comparative claim because they are comparing how the symptoms got worse after the second tour and not the first.

“Brannan was in a terrible place.” – A causal claim is being used here by stating the circumstances of the place Brannan was in.

“Danna had been through much of the exact same turmoil, decades ago, and had opened a center to help get Vietnam vets benefits and educate their spouses and communities about their condition” – – This would be a categorical claim because in the statement there is a list of details retaining to what Danna had experienced. 

“This is the only reason I am well.” – This is a causal claim because the speaker clearly states that this singular reason is why she is well.

“People care when you tell them.” – This is a causal claim due to the fact that is person is just putting the statement out there and assumes this with everyone.

Posted in Fulcrum, PTSD Claims | Leave a comment

PTSD Claims Task-TristanB50

The amount of progress in Caleb’s six years of therapy has been frustrating for everyone. But ultimately, says Alain Brunet, vice president of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies and director of the Traumatic Stress Laboratory at McGill University in Canada, “we have reason to be reasonably optimistic. Psychotherapy does work for typical PTSD.” 

In these sentences, a credibility claim is made to back up the effectiveness of psychotherapy for people with PTSD, despite it being a lengthy process. The authority figure cited is Alain Brunet, and mentions both of his job titles to gain credibility.

The VA tends to favor cognitive-behavioral therapy and exposure therapy—whereby traumatic events are hashed out and rehashed until they become, theoretically, less consuming. Some state VA offices also offer group therapy. For severe cases, the agency offers inpatient programs, one of which Caleb resided in for three months in 2010. 

This paragraph categorical claim, listing off the many therapeutic treatment methods the VA offers to patients suffering from PTSD. All of these treatments highlight the VA’s modern approach and portray them as catering to many different people.

The VA also endorses eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy (EMDR), which is based on the theory that memories of traumatic events are, in effect, improperly stored, and tries to refile them by discussing those memories while providing visual or auditory stimulus. 

The author uses a definition claim here to define and describe the process of EMDR, and how they help soldiers who suffer from PTSD. 

“There’s a fairly strong consensus around CBT and EMDR,” Brunet says. 

Here is another credibility claim, where Brunet is mentioned once again. This time, the quote is used to decipher which methods seem to be the most effective.

While veterans are waiting for those to work, they’re often prescribed complicated antidepressant-based pharmacological cocktails.

This shorter point is an illustrative claim, painting a picture of the strong medicines the veterans need to take during their treatment by comparing it to a cocktail. It reminds us of the conditions the veterans are in while they are receiving this intense treatment.

To stay up to date on the latest advances in PTSD treatment, the VA collaborates with outside entities through its Intramural Research Program. Currently, the agency is funding 130 PTSD-related studies, from testing whether hypertension drugs might help to examining the effectiveness of meditation therapy, or providing veterans with trauma-sensitive service dogs, like Caleb’s. 

When the author mentions the number of studies the VA funds, they are making a numerical claim. This assures the reader that the VA is taking a lot of data into account when developing their treatment methods.

The Mental Health Research Portfolio manager says the organization is “highly concerned and highly supportive” of PTSD research.

This sentence uses the MHRP as a source, making it an evaluative claim. Their authority asserts that the VA takes its research very seriously and takes very good care of its patients.

But a lot of FOV members and users are impatient with the progress. 

Takes into account the feelings of the patients and the worker, making it an evaluative claim. This claim gives us some scale of the length of the treatment.

Up until 2006, the VA was spending $9.9 million, just 2.5 percent of its medical and prosthetic research budget, on PTSD studies. In 2009, funding was upped to $24.5 million. 

The author uses a comparative claim here, comparing the VA’s annual funding of studies from 2006-2009. This increase shows us that they are taking them more seriously than in the past.

But studies take a long time, and any resulting new directives take even longer to be implemented.

Uses a causal claim to set up the relationship between the long winded process of conducting studies, and the restraining effects it has on developing new research methods.

Posted in PTSD Claims, TristanB | 3 Comments

PTSD Claims-Saycheese

Today she’s fielding phone calls from a woman whose veteran son was committed to a non-VA psychiatric facility, but he doesn’t want to be at the facility because he, a severe-PTSD sufferer, was already paranoid before one of the other resident loons threatened to kill him, and anyway he fought for his fucking country and they promised they wouldn’t abandon him and he swears to God he will have to kill himself if the VA doesn’t put him in with the other soldiers. Another veteran’s wife calls from the parking lot of a diner to which she fled when her husband looked like he was going to boil over in rage. Another woman’s husband had a service dog die in the night, and the death smell in the morning triggered an episode she worries will end in him hurting himself or someone else if she doesn’t get him into a VA hospital, and the closest major clinic is four hours away and she is eight and a half months pregnant and got three hours of sleep, and the clinic’s website says its case manager position for veterans of Iraq or Afghanistan is currently unstaffed, anyway.”

This whole paragraph can be described as a Categorical Claim. The author uses different woman’s experiences with dealing with their loved ones’ PTSD episodes and the failure to receive help from the VA to show that the institution has many flaws and can’t help everyone.

“The phone never stops ringing. If it does for 14 seconds, Brannan writes an email to help get whatever someone needs or publishes a blog post about her own struggles.”

This sentence shows a causal claim, it explains that the phone never stops ringing inferring that Brannan is very busy with her work with people who suffer from PTSD. It also can show that Brannon is determined to help in any way she can when it says she writes an email when the phone isn’t ringing.

“He leans forward to put his glass of orange juice on the table; it takes many, many long seconds for him to cover the few inches; today, like most days, he feels “like a damn train ran over me.” “But because of the feedback she got, I know that other people were going through the same shit I was. And she’s helping people

This quote can show an Attributive Claim, the authors didn’t verify or say if Brannon was truly helping through her work with the VA however, from the quote received from Caleb it can be inferred that even if it’s just a little bit she is helping people suffering from PTSD.   

““Breathe,” Brannan says to nearly every woman who calls, though when I ask her if she follows her own advice, she says no. “If I stopped, and started breathing,” she says, “I would be too sad.””

The quote above shows a Casual Claim. Although Brannon tries to help every woman who calls, she can’t, and it is stated that their stories do make her sad and if she stopped to think about all of them it would hurt a lot.

“If she’s not saving lives on the phone or blogging, she’s offering support via Facebook, where thousands of Families of a Vet user and nearly 500 FOV volunteers congregate and commiserate.” 

This quote could be a numerical or quantitative claim. It gives us numeral values on how many people are on her Facebook page who need help or who are offering advice.

“Kateri tells the story of how her family was at Olive Garden when she started sobbing into her Zuppa Toscana. There was no visible reason for it. Just the general overwhelmingness of her distress, of that awful overstimulating hypervigilance, the sort of thing you develop sometimes when you live with someone who looks out the living room window for danger literally hundreds of times a day, or who goes from room to room, room to room, over and over to make sure everyone in each one is still alive.” 

This quote shows a Factual and categorical claim. When the author describes the reasons Kateri started crying at olive garden shows the factual claim that secondhand PTSD is a very real thing and does make people suffer. The categorical claim comes from the explanation of what living with someone’s PTSD is like because it is categorizing the effects of her husband’s PTSD.   

“Kateri’s eight-year-old son now also counts the exits in new spaces he enters, points them out to his loved ones, and keeps a mental map of them at the ready, until war or fire fails to break out, and everyone is safely back home.”

This quote is a Casual and comparative claim. It shows the cause and effects of being a young child living with a family member who suffers from PTSD. It isn’t the job of an 8-year-old to know how to get out of any new place they visit also the author uses the last part of the sentence to compare the 8-year-old’s mind to that of his fathers.   

Posted in PTSD Claims, SayCheese | 1 Comment

Stone Money – InspireAngels

Money is a Made-up Concept

Money is an economic exchange we used to buy goods and services. We use it in our everyday life to acquire a business, personal wants, or essential needs. A person goes into a store and purchases an item. The worker at the register scans the item and the customer hands them a green rectangle sheet of paper with a number on it. The worker takes this green sheet of paper and hands the customer their item. This thin sheet of paper holds such power that it’s equivalent to the item their purchasing. The concept of money, it’s absurd to think about. After reading “The Island of Stone Money” I have come to realize that money is only valuable because we believe money has value. In other words, if one day our society decides to stop using paper bills as currency then any paper dollar bill you own becomes meaningless, it would just be a green sheet of paper. Money as we see it is fictional.

Michael Friedman reviews the notion of stone money on the island of Yap in German, as well as compares this concept similarly enough to the situation in the Bank of France in 1933. On the island of Yap, after it was purchased from Spain in 1898, the people of this island were ordered to repair the roads of this island. However many disregard it until the government took matters into its own hands, where they send a man “to every failu and pablai….where he simply marked a certain number of the most valuable fei with a cross in black paint.”(Friedman 2) The government did this to show that they owned the stones. People started to then fix these paths only for the government to come back later and erase any black cross marks on the stones. In the Bank of France, France feared that the U.S. would not keep its gold standard at its traditional price. This leads the Bank of France to request the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to convert dollar assets that it had in the U.S. to gold. So once again, the Bank of France asks Federal Reserve Bank to store gold in their account. The Federal Reserve Bank goes to a drawer, places gold in it, and marks it as the property of France. Closely to the way, the government from the island of Yaps marks those stones with a black cross. Money in these situations appears real to the people who use it, whether it is stones or gold. Money is worth something when we place value on it and accepts it holds a value no matter what currency we use. The people of the island of Yaps believe the stones hold value just as the French believe they hold more power and wealth than the U.S. dollar because their drawers were marked. As ridiculous as that sounds, money is made up and we as an individual decide whether or not it holds a worth.

In addition, the NPR podcast goes on about how Brazil’s government tricked its citizens into believing that their currency was worth something again. The citizens of Brazil have stopped believing that money was worth something. There was a ton of inflation and prices would constantly change every week. At that point, people had lost faith in the monetary value. A new proposal was made by the president in charge at the time demanding that the people of Brazil would not be able to take money out of their bank accounts. People then started losing all respect for the government and money as a whole. Then these economists were invited to solve the solution of economics in Brazil. They suggested limiting the amount of paper money that was being made but mainly they had to stabilize individuals’ faith in money. A proposal was made to have virtual currency, to use URV to save the economy of Brazil. Everyone in Brazil had tricked themselves into believing that this fake currency was real. This story of Brazil’s economy just demonstrates how money is real if people trust it’s real. If society as a whole stops believing the currency they hold is no longer real, then it no longer exists, it’s imaginary.

Bitcoin had its first bitcoin crash in 2013 as many predict for this virtual currency. On Wednesday the value of a bitcoin was $266 only to come to a value of $58 three days later. However, Gavin Anderson, the Bitcoin Foundation’s chief scientist predicts that this will not be the end of the bitcoin era. Bitcoin was made by “an anonymous programmer who wanted currency independent of any central bank”(Renut, 2013) during the financial crisis in 2009. Bitcoin is unpredictable so there’s a risk invested in something that doesn’t a “commodity.” The system is complicated and complex since it’s created by complex codes from the computer. The only way you could cash out bitcoin is if someone is willing to buy them. However, this currency can be hacked by stealing or creating its code to create bitcoin, it’s vulnerable. People invested in this bitcoin, either way, knowing that its value is based on how much a person thinks it’s worth. The value of a bitcoin is fluid, all the more making much more sense as to why money is an invented concept by people to believe it holds value in society.

In conclusion, money is an imaginary notion that we give significance to because we believe it. Without the faith of people in society to believe the worth of the current currency, it loses its meaning, and its value overall. Humans need to be convinced that the money we hold serves a purpose or else what is there to believe?

References

Friedman, M. (n.d.). 1991 island stone money – hoover institution. “The Island of Stone Money”. Retrieved February 15, 2023, from https://miltonfriedman.hoover.org/internal/media/dispatcher/215061/full

Renaut, A. (n.d.). The bubble bursts on e-currency bitcoin. Yahoo! News. Retrieved February 15, 2023, from https://sg.news.yahoo.com/bubble-bursts-e-currency-bitcoin-064913387–finance.html

The invention of money. This American Life. (2018, February 19). Retrieved February 15, 2023, from https://www.thisamericanlife.org/423/the-invention-of-money

Posted in InspireAngels, Stone Money | 3 Comments

Stone Money—TristanB50

How to Buy Money

Money, like many concepts, is capable of generating more and more skepticism as it’s inspected further. It becomes harder and harder to pin down it’s real use when closely examined, ultimately being shrugged off as an unexplainable prerequisite for a society to properly function. However in countries like the U.S that have relatively stable economies, we forget that money isn’t actually a solid thing. We often chock up money to it’s purchasing power in the present, forgetting that it could easily be subjected to change. The dollar could be compared to a stock, it’s value is contingent on the publics faith in the currency. 

Micronesia’s Island of Yap has been making economists squint at our view of money for the past 100 years. The island gained popularity for its novel stone disks that they use as currency, making up the basis of their economy. What’s stranger is the islanders rules surrounding the currency, stones that have sunk into the ocean are still honored, still usable by the owner despite them not being physically present. The defacto owners of the stone, a family, still utilize their invisible wealth generations later, as The Island of Stone Money author William Furness III writes, “a family whose wealth was unquestioned –acknowledged by everyone– and yet no one, not even the family itself had ever laid eye or hand on this wealth”. 

The islanders are also known to trade stones without actually moving them, meaning the coins remain at the same residence it resided at before the transaction. A household may own the stone without actually owning the stone. In reality, the most important part of the ordeal is that the public recognizes the recipient as the new owner. This seems bizarre, but in reality is similar to making any banking transaction. When we deposit money in our bank, they eventually turn around and give it to someone else, with the promise that you will be paid later on. Most of our wealth is based off IOU’s and account balances than something with intrinsic value like assets, or stone disks.

Under certain scenarios, the islanders seem like they are placing value on the physical aspects of their currency. During the island’s period of colonial German occupation, the government forced the islanders to repair their roads by marking their coins with black crosses. This caused the villagers to go into economic crisis, rushing to smooth out their roads. To the villagers, the physical location of the money is not really important, but who has claim towards the money. 

The intrigue of this story doesn’t come from how strange the islanders are, but rather how similar it is to modern monetary systems. Crisis’ like 2008’s housing bubble prove to us that the amount of money circulating in our economy is a lot more up in the air than we think. No money was lost during the housing bubble, but rather as Ira Glass explained on NPR’s Planet Money, “…[it] never existed in the first place.” The money the Fed wires over to banks, who in turn dole it out in the form of loans, is built on an if: whether the recipient can pay the loan back or not. In a way it’s much easier for a villager living in Yap to check the amount of money circling in their economy, simply walk around the island and count all the stones.

The implementation of the Brazilian Real is an example of the public increasing the purchasing power of their currency. Since the 1950s, the government had been rapidly printing money, their Brazilian cruzeiros, to fund a city planning project. This effectively flooded their economy with money, creating inflation. Lowered purchasing power of the cruzeiro brewed economic doubt towards its worth, causing retailers to frequently raise their prices. At its worst, the inflation rate reached 80% per month, prices climbing daily. Grocery stores were a brawl, where shoppers would have to physically race employees holding the price gun. People had to spend their money fast, as leaving it around would cause it to lose value over time.

To combat the discontent, in the 1990s the Brazilian government created a standard virtual currency, the URV. It’s fixed price gave citizens confidence in the purchasing power of the cruzeiros, as consumers could receive weekly updates on the value of the money in their wallets. Over time, retailers stopped raising their prices, people started taking out more loans, and the inflation died down. Eventually the cruzeiro and URVs were phased out, in favor of the newer Brazilian Real, a name which ironically contradicts its completely virtual conception. Brazil’s economic turmoil was caused by mass-printing money, effectively delegitimizing their currency. Any solution the government made was ultimately contingent on the peoples faith in their currency, and the decisions they made with their confidence.

Real world examples of money that people treat as a stock have been gaining a lot of media attention in the past decade, specifically cryptocurrency. Market Watch critiques Bitcoin for, among other things, it’s volatility. “While bitcoin surged from about $13 in January 2013 to a peak of roughly $1,150 at the end of November 2013, prices were as low as $178 a few weeks ago. Such a wild range in roughly two years should show how speculative bitcoin is.” However we know that similar to cryptocurrency, money’s value is capable of fluctuating astronomical amounts in a matter of weeks, as seen in Brazil.

What separates national currencies from cryptocurrency is the infrastructure built around them, in an attempt to create stability amidst the ever-changing prices caused by the supply chain. There are central banks, reports, treasuries ensuring the value of our bills and change. However, all of that infrastructure is built around essentially a fairy tale. 

Currency isn’t Tinkerbell, it doesn’t necessarily have more power the more we believe in it. However, doubt in the value of, the dollar for example, causes serious inflationary implications at a large scale. This is why governments generally focus on building accountability in their currency, while continuing to print money at a reasonable pace.

Posted in Stone Money, TristanB | 1 Comment

Stone Money–SinatraMan17

Money, by itself, is “stone” cold.

“Stone Money” is an abstract philosophy on the definition of currency that stems from history, but couldn’t be more pertinent to modern America and much of the world. The “stone”ness of the money is referencing accounts from the Island of Yap, whose money was at one point literally made of useless, extremely-heavy stone, but it also expresses the idea that what we know as money today has no value unless an authority says so. Money itself is devoid of meaning, of life; it is “stone” cold.

The Invention of Money is a podcast from NPR in which journalists explore this very idea of money having no meaning. Within the three sections of the podcast, the journalists discuss the context of the story at Yap, while also connecting this story to present-day events such as the Brazilian economy and the American 2008 real estate crisis. It’s notable to recognize the podcast is from 2011, and how we view the present & past economy is ever-changing. The point that struck me as the most compelling from The Invention of Money is the description of the 2008 financial crisis, and how the “Fed” stepped in, in order to prevent a recession of 1920s proportions. With large investment banks failing left and right, such as Lehman Brothers and Bear Sterns, the Federal Reserve Bank was forced to assist. With no other hope to save the economy, one day around a small conference table in New York a bunch of guys in suits simply created more money. And this “money” was then injected into the economy to save the day. While admittedly the mechanics do stump me, the philosophy of it all is fascinating. The “money” that the Fed created wasn’t earned or taken from an existing hoard of some sort, it had no backing or value yet in the world. But once the authorities recognized its existence, the value was given. 

In an essay written by Milton Friedman titled “The Island of Stone Money”, the details of the economics of Yap Island are deeply analyzed. The island uses giant stone “coins” as their universal currency. Most intriguing, Friedman brings up that once during a water transport of one of these coins, a storm forced the crew to abandon the stone and lose it to the depths of the ocean. Friedman explains in his essay “When they reached home, they all testified that the fei [coin] was of magnificent proportions and of extraordinary quality and that it was lost through no fault of the owner. Thereupon it was universally conceded in their simple faith that the mere accident of its loss overboard was too trifling to mention and that a few hundred feet of water offshore ought not to affect its marketable value”. The public trusted the sailors’ word and began to spend that money- even though they didn’t know for sure whether it even existed.

Moreover, all the Americans that went on to buy and sell things with the “new” money created by the Fed in 2008 were merely trusting the word of the authorities. To put it in Yap terms, this money is like that stone that floated to the bottom of the ocean. And those who testified that it was definitely there, and were trusted, are the authorities of the Federal Reserve Bank. Our current financial system is therefore founded on “Stone Money”. But unlike the giant stones on Yap which ARE tangible and exist in real-life, our money has no backing anymore. Our “stone” money consists ONLY of stones lost under the water. Are the stones actually there? The Fed says so, however, it doesn’t even matter because Americans will spend the money regardless. Money is an idea, a “Fiction” as the NPR journalist says, an imaginary glue that holds merely the entire world together. 

I’m reminded of a scene from one of my favorite films- the 1946 Christmas classic It’s a Wonderful Life. In it, the protagonist lending-house owner, Goerge Bailey, is speaking to a group of scared individuals all wishing to withdraw their funds from the bank. Quoted directly from the script “You’re thinking of this place all wrong. As if I had the money back in a safe. The money’s not here. Your money’s in Joe’s house . . . And in the Kennedy house, and Mrs. Macklin’s house, and a hundred others. Why you’re lending them the money to build, and then they’re going to pay it back to you as best they can.” This is a brilliant expression of the mechanics of how lending works. The idea that the money in your savings account is technically earmarked as yours, its value is lended off to the masses in the form of credit. Your “money” becomes someone else’s “money”, and endlessly so on.

As a whole, the idea that money is meaningless is an infinitely explorable theory that boggles the mind. However, with that being said, money means success, prosperity, and comfort to us. And in turn, DOES have tangible value. While the fact that we are all simply taking a higher authority’s word for it is true, that dollar bill in your pocket can be exchanged for a candy bar- and that’s NOT fiction. Money is “stone” cold, fake, and breathless by itself. But thankfully, money never is “by itself”. 

References

The Invention of Money – This American Life. (2011, January 7). This American Life. https://www.thisamericanlife.org/423/the-invention-of-money

Friedman, Milton. “The Island of Stone Money.” Diss. Hoover Institution, Stanford University, 1991. 1991 Island Stone Money (hoover.org)

Frances Goodrich, Albert Hackett, Frank Capra – 1946 –  It’s a Wonderful Life

Posted in SinatraMan, Stone Money | 4 Comments

Stone Money: G00dSoup

Money is a Necessity

An item accepted as payment for goods and services is essentially what money is. In the world, money is currently worth what we already know it to be. The only reason we spend money is to get what we want, to have fun, or to buy what we need in order to live. Every country develops an economy capable of balancing and stabilizing the market and currency. In some cases, people are not aware of the fact that the “economies” of different countries may differ significantly from one another on a number of levels.

Now, the term “currency” has been used and translated in many regions of the world, and each nation has its own interpretation of what “money” really is. Stones were used as money in the Yaps. The currency is unique in that unlike other nations, you do not have to give another person your stone in order to obtain something. Instead, you can claim possession of the stone (money) as if it were nothing. This was a topic discussed in the podcast “The Invention of Money.”

Moreover, this has made me think that, if it were to occur, money might be viewed as anything. Currently, the only forms of currency used in the United States are “bills” and “coins.” We also have cards that can electronically store our money in addition to that. The more you consider it, the more intriguing it becomes. But what if we didn’t pay for things with “bills” and “cards”? What if we employed a common object, like a pebble. Perhaps the value of a little pebble is equivalent to that of a penny, while the value of a larger pebble is equivalent to that of a quarter. Numerous possibilities exist regarding what kind of currency could exist.

Milton Friedman, the writer of “The Island of Stone Money” outlines the main points from the podcast mentioned previously. Friedman discusses many currencies throughout history, with an emphasis on the Yaps from a neighboring island. They traded stones and granted rights to them in exchange for corpses or other items. The stones ranged in size and form, with some being as large as people and others as small as rocks. Friedman recounted how, in order to satisfy the Bank of France’s worries that the United States was departing from the “gold standard,” the Federal Reserve Bank traded dollars for gold on their behalf in the early 1930s. This enables the use of money for purposes other than meeting minimal but necessary costs. Due to this, we are able to interact with others who are different from us and trade services with them because of this.

It is imperative to note that, contrary to appearances, countries on the map of the world would not be able to prosper without money. This is because they would be left on their own to take care of themselves. In a nation, money is viewed as a nation’s “fuel.” Businesses within a nation grow because of the influence of money. It seems that people can only…live…by having money, or at least that is what it seems to be.

Now if we delve a bit further into modern money, Bitcoin, a form of digital currency that functions without a central bank, has taken off. People are raving about this cryptocurrency as a result. Evidently, one bitcoin is equal to around 21,000 US dollars. All of us would have much more money than we could possibly imagine if we all had access to bitcoin. In retrospect, it makes sense that this would be the case; having enough money to cover bills and basic needs.

As I mentioned, Bitcoin is a digital currency, so essentially, it is not “real.” Jeff Reeves, author of the article “Bitcoin has no place in your — or any portfolio” elaborates on one point that stood out to me; how bitcoin has no true value. “Proponents like to talk about how bitcoin has no central bank or authority behind it as a net positive, but that fact also means a lack of true value. A bitcoin, then, is simply worth whatever a random person is willing to pay — derisively known as the “greater fool” theory, because profits rely on your ability to find someone more foolish than yourself who is willing to buy higher.” Even in terms of money, something like bitcoin could not even be on someone’s radar. Within the next several decades, it’s possible that bitcoin may take over and replace traditional currencies, given how quickly technology is evolving.

By extending the concept of money from stones to cryptocurrency, we have undoubtedly done so. In addition to its uniqueness, it possesses a variety of forms, and it continues to add new currencies to the digital market at a rapid rate. Whatever its form, money will always be necessary for the world to function. The notion that we must have money in order to live in this world has increased in popularity.

References

“The Invention of Stone Money” 423: The Invention of Stone Money. This is American Life, WBEZ. Chicago. 7 Jan 2011 https://www.thisamericanlife.org/423/the-invention-of-money

Friedman, Milton, “The Island of Stone Money” Diss. Hoover Institution, Stanford University, 1991https://miltonfriedman.hoover.org/internal/media/dispatcher/215061/full

Reeves, J. (n.d.). Bitcoin has no place in your — or any — portfolio. MarketWatch. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/bitcoin-has-no-place-in-any-portfolio-2015-01-28

Posted in G00dSoup, Stone Money | 7 Comments

Stone Money – Charlieclover

The concept of money is understood by all people. It has the utmost importance and serves as the foundation for practically all significant decisions made worldwide. While if you are able, you use the money to purchase the things you want. Similarly, just possessing money gives you a great sense of peace of mind. With the ultimate goal of earning more money, people spend their entire lives mastering their jobs or advancing in their education. People depend on money to continue with their daily lives, therefore losing it would be very stressful. Money is a powerful concept that we either think about constantly or never think about at all since we are so used to spending it.

Do you think anyone has ever questioned why we use money? For some people, spending money genuinely is a way of life. Or do we simply all engage in it and regard it as normal since that is how we have always lived? After listening to a podcast and reading two fantastic essays about money, its history, and its value, I became interested in money conspiracies and what other people think and believe about this topic.

The Island of Yap’s story shocks many as too far-fetched, distant, and foreign to comprehend the notion that society might accept wealth through stones they have never seen. However, if we look into the mirror, we may see the reality we are currently living in is the same. The use of cash as a form of payment is declining, according to economists. The money we claim to have earned is never actually seen or handled by us because we receive our salary by direct deposit. We are continuously spending, earning, and borrowing money, yet we have no understanding of what happens to it.

The money is deposited into our accounts and sent to another location when we put in the time and decide it is worth this amount. The cash you earn and deposit into the bank isn’t actually yours, yet. No cash is put into or taken out of a box connected to your bank account when you make a deposit or purchase. Even though money may not physically exist, it is crucial to the world’s ability to succeed. The 2008 financial crisis had a significant impact on the country, and its aftereffects may still be felt in the current economy and social structure. 

My perspective on money has clearly changed as a result of the podcast I recently listened to. You would think that money cannot lose its value, therefore how did its value decline when the real estate market crashed? Money has led us to assume that it is all a big scam. When it was ruled that dollars could only be used as a concept of money and couldn’t be traded for gold, the practice of exchanging paper for gold was reversed.

In the story of the creation of money, it is explained that even when you pay a bill online, only information is sent; no funds are really sent from the bank to cover your phone bill. Money is an illusion. When I think about it, it just makes so much sense. The residents of Yap Island think that money isn’t all that different from the wealthy stones at the bottom of the ocean. It is somewhat worrisome how readily people accept ideas just because the government says so.

“The Invention of Stone Money.” 423: The Invention of Stone Money. This Is American Life, WBEZ. Chicago. 7 Jan. 2011.

Friedman, Milton. “The Island of Stone Money.” Diss. Hoover Institution, Stanford University , 1991. 1991 Island Stone Money (hoover.org)

Renaut, A. (2013, April 13). The bubble bursts on e-currency bitcoin. Yahoo! News. https://sg.news.yahoo.com/bubble-bursts-e-currency-bitcoin-064913387–finance.html

Posted in CharlieClover, Stone Money | 1 Comment