Definition Rewrite- Queen Random

Needs a Title

The justification for the existence of police is that they exist to keep us, the citizens, safe. Ancient and modern history has shown time and time again that this is not the case. But, by definition, they are employees of the state. The supposed goal and purpose of police is to be servants of the people. The same way politicians, who are elected to the positions they hold, are meant to be most beneficial to the people they serve. Politicians like police, are private citizens with political power, the difference between the two is that there is a system in place that makes sure politicians are able to be held responsible for their actions; be it checks and balances, federal prosecution, or simply not being reelected. The power police hold is only kept in check by their fellow officers.  The two careers are similar in the way politicians end up looking out for their own wellbeing, interests, and motives, and police end up protecting themselves and their partners. Policing has become more than a job, being a police officer is a lifestyle that completely indoctrinates any person that partakes in any role in the system that has been created. There can be no good or bad cops when the act of being a police officer inherently corrupts any cops’ sense of morality. 

In order to go through training the police develop an overtly strong sense of camaraderie rallying themselves against the people they have, apparently, been created to serve. The training environment creates a mentality within police officers that separates them from the people they serve. So, when they are serving they hold a Us Vs them or even us or them mentality. Pitting cops against the people they are ‘by design’ created to serve. The mentality created is one that changes law enforcement’s role from a servant serving the law and its people. To a role where they become the law, abiding by a higher jurisdiction where they create the rules they want to follow. If we look further into the history of police and how they came to be we can make the conclusion that this was no accident. Police are, by design, created to abuse and terrorize. In the previous portion of the essay I recognized the relationship between slavery and policing. To refresh these direct correlations I reintroduce, Gary Potter, a social justice professor at the University of Eastern Kentucky, he had the same questions I do when it came to the development of policing in the united states, he said this, “ Slave patrols had three primary functions: (1) to chase down, apprehend, and return to their owners, runaway slaves; (2) to provide a form of organized terror to deter slave revolts; and, (3) to maintain a form of discipline for slave-workers who were subject to summary justice, outside of the law, if they violated any plantation rules.” From this quote alone we can already see the way this mindset has been adapted to modern policing. They were told to deter slave revolts in the modern day, they brutalize protesters. They create and inspire fear. We as a society can fool ourselves into a false sense of morality when it comes to the police and lie about why they were made and why they still exist but the police’s own actions incriminate themselves. 

People can hold the claim that it’s just a few bad apples that give policing as a career a bad reputation. I believe a tree with rotten roots can only ever produce bad apples. It’s been established that the ideas and expectations the police were created to continue into the modern day. From the National Law Enforcement Officer Fund, “Slave patrols were no less violent in their control of African Americans; they beat and terrorized as well. Their distinction was that they were legally compelled to do so by local authorities. In this sense, it was considered a civic duty—one that in some areas could result in a fine if avoided.” It was not only encouraged but expected of the police to be terrorist to the Black community. Terrorizing normal black people or even our most prominent figures, like Martin Luther King Jr., whose assassination  has been confirmed to have been executed by law enforcement.  

The police’s modern abuse of power can be traced back to the guidelines set by slave patrollers also, “-subject to summary justice, outside of the law-” In the times this quote was written the justice would be subjecting the escaped enslaved people to beatings, maulings or worse: death. In today’s times this mindset has only continued to be exasperated and utilized by government officials, police brutality in any form occurs because the police are making themselves the judge, jury and executioner. Most often times when someone has been killed by the police there is justification given that they were committing a crime beforehand in the case of George Floyd, according to the APD News George Floyd was arrested, “about a possible counterfeit $20 bill being used at a corner store” It is a purposeful and deliberate endless chain of terror enacted by the police. It’s not a mistake of the lack of morality they’ve been trained to have when it comes to policing. 

The idea of policing is one that continues to keep so much of this country in a wonderland. Full of false hope and dreams of the police being the country’s Knight in shining armor. The reality of police and the way they function is a much more grim truth. One that, I hope, would change your perspective on policing in this country permanently. Modern policing tactics and belief systems have been adopted and accepted from Slave Patrollers. People whose entire mission was to keep people enslaved. The police of the modern day continue on with the same mission of those that came before and shouldn’t continue to be able to exist. The police are brutal, inhumane and violent.



National Law Enforcement Officers Funds, Slave Patrols an Early Form Of Policing,, Accessed 2023

News, APD, Timeline of Events since George Floyd’s Arrest and Murder, 2022 

Potter, Gary, The History of Policing in the United States, Eastern Kansas University, 2013 

This entry was posted in Definition Rewrite, QueenRandom. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Definition Rewrite- Queen Random

  1. davidbdale says:

    If you’re up to a rhetorical challenge, QueenRandom, you should set up a riddle for your readers that suggests you’re describing a politician but instead are describing a cop.

    1. My job is to keep the population safe.
    2. I work for the government.
    3. My job is to serve the community.

    Who am I? Police or Politician? Can’t decide. Here’s more details:
    A. I’m elected to the position I hold.
    B. I’m a private person with political power.
    C. A system keeps me accountable.
    D. My comrades protect me from accountability.
    E. We look out for our own.
    F. We look out for our own.
    G. My job corrupts me.

    Figure out how you want to ORGANIZE the 10-or-so claims in your Introduction, QueenRandom. The comparison is worth making, but some of the characteristics are shared, others not. You need a plan to sort them out.


  2. davidbdale says:

    All the way through, I waited for an argument that BLAMES Politicians for the excesses of the Police.

    Why did you bother with that lengthy comparison of their motivations and procedures if you didn’t intend to couple them as Co-Conspirators in suppressing the freedoms of “the others.”

    Isn’t that where your work is trending, QueenRandom? Politicians tend to defend and support law enforcement’s aggressive tactics BECAUSE they need a formidable physical dominance to keep their constituents compliant. Right?


    • queenrandom04 says:

      I thought I had done that with the connection to the government but I guess the connection was in my brain and the way I correlate things. Thank you I’ll make sure to flesh out this concept in my final draft.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s