Banned Drugs Are The Key to Making Baseball Better
Permitting practical, therapeutic, and supervised use of anabolic steroids which are currently banned by Major League Baseball may reduce recovery time and increase fan interest.
Major League Baseball has published a list of every single banned substance that has been revised and re-evaluated over the years. The list is divided into 3 major categories; Drugs of Abuse, Stimulants, and PED’s. Of these three categories I am in full agreement that the stimulants and drugs of abuse that have been banned by Major League Baseball are rightfully banned.
Drugs of abuse, as defined by Major League Baseball are “Any and all drugs or substances included on Schedules I and II of the Code of Federal Regulations’ Schedule of Controlled Substances (“Schedule I or Schedule II”), as amended from time to time, shall be considered Drugs of Abuse” Some of the drugs included in this category are cocaine, codeine, heroin, MDMA, LSD, and PCP. Stimulants are drugs that improve brain to body communication. Amphetamines are the commonly known types of stimulant drugs and are a part of Major League Baseball’s banned substance list under the stimulant category. Drugs under these categories that reside on the MLB’s banned substance list are justifiably there. These drugs are known as addictive and the side effects of these substances aren’t in any way shape or form useful or safe for players to experience while on the field.
The third category of banned substances is performance enhancing substances. This category is divided into multiple subcategories. One of the subcategories is Anabolic Agents which are defined by Major League Baseball as “Any and all Anabolic Androgenic Steroids included in Schedule III of the Code of Federal Regulations’ Schedule of Controlled Substances (“Schedule III”), as amended from time to time, shall be considered a Performance Enhancing Substance covered by the Program.” Some notable anabolic agents that are included on the list are trenbolone, testosterone, oxymetholone, nandrolone, boldenone, and oxandrolone. The next subcategory is Peptide Hormones, Growth Factors and Related Substances. These substances initiate and regulate cortisol release and tissue production. Some notable substances banned from this category are hGH, IGF-1, and HGC. The last subcategory of PED’s I’ll cover is Diuretics and Masking Agents. Major League Baseball defines these substances as “products that substitute, dilute, mask, or adulterate a specimen used in drug testing, or impair the excretion of Prohibited Substances to conceal their presence in a specimen.” Thiazides are on the banned list and are the most common diuretic. Examples of Thiazides are Bendroflumethiazide, Chlorothiazide, and Hydrochlorothiazide.
Of each category of banned substances in Major League Baseball, Performance Enhancing Substances have accounted for the most suspensions at the major league level. Since suspensions became the punishment for violating performance enhancers policies in 2005, an average of over 6 players a year have been suspended at the major league level for banned performance enhancers.
The most recent and notable suspension for PED’s was one of the games most coveted superstars, Fernando Tatis Jr. of the San Diego Padres. Tatis was suspended 80 games after testing positive for clostebol, an anabolic-androgenic steroid that serves a similar purpose as testosterone. Clostebol is a part of the MLB’s banned substance list. However, Tatis claims he didn’t use the drug to improve his performance. Tatis claims to have taken the drug as a treatment for ringworm. In an article from MARCA, a sports media outlet, it states “This is a fungus that is very common in athletes and they treat it with medication that contains Clostebol….Tatis trusted his physician and made a terrible mistake that cost him nearly a full season’s worth of suspension. ” Although in Tatis’ case he wasn’t using PED’s to improve his game, the history of past abuse in the league left Major League Baseball no choice but to suspend Tatis. This is where I believe a line needs to be drawn.
I fully understand the history of PED abuse in baseball and why Major League Baseball went to the extremes they went to in hopes to prevent the power trips and blatant abuse of steroids that we saw in the 1990’s and 2000’s. But there are cases where these banned substances are a necessary means of recovery for athletes. Tatis’ case is a perfect example. A solution to a case like Tatis’ is a network of medical personnel from the players personal doctor to the league office. If a player’s personal doctor prescribes them a medicine that includes a banned substance, there should be a communication network from that doctor, to a league medical official who authorizes/monitors the prescription/dosage. Another step that would be necessary to this process is baseline testing. If a player has a baseline test of certain levels of hormones and other internal/physical factors, there will be a way of telling if a player is using the substances for their medically intended purpose and if the player abused the drug based on the comparison of their baseline to their retest.
One of the key reasons I’d like to see the MLB adopt a system similar to this is because of oblique injuries. In a study done on oblique injuries from the 2011 season to the 2015 season, 259 players at the major league level suffered oblique injuries resulting in 6,132 days missed. Batters/Position Players averaged 3 weeks missed per injury with over an 8% chance of re-injury. Starting Pitchers averaged nearly a month missed with a re-injury rate of around 5% and relievers averaged about 24 days missed with a re-injury rate of nearly 10%. The average days missed on recurrent oblique injuries is also higher compared to the days missed from the primary injury. These injuries are not a day to day type of injury and a statistical analysis of recovery methods shows that some players required injection of a corticosteroid, a legal steroid in Major League Baseball. However, this still didn’t speed up recovery process as it took players 30 days to recover post injection.
Anabolic steroids are known for speeding the recovery of muscle injuries at rates much better than others. Regulation and supervision of anabolic steroids in Major League Baseball specifically for injury recovery could lead to injuries like oblique strains having faster recovery times and less recurrence. With the system in place that I mentioned previously, there could definitely be a way to make sure that the substances aren’t abused and that players don’t exceed their baseline levels/capability while using these substances.
References
“MLB steroid suspensions (2005-2022).” Baseball Almanac. Retrieved March 6, 2023
“Epidemiology and Impact of Abdominal Oblique Injuries in Major and Minor League Baseball Christopher L. Camp,* MD, Stan Conte,†‡ PT, DPT, ATC, Steven B. Cohen,§ MD, Matthew Thompson,|| MD, John D’ Angelo,{ BS, Joseph T. Nguyen,# MPH,
and Joshua S. Dines,** MD. Retrieved March 6, 2023
“What is Clostebol? the steroid Fernando Tatis Jr. took by accident and got him suspended“. MARCA. (2022, August 13) Retrieved March 6, 2023
“Major League Baseball’s Minor League Drug Prevention And Treatment Program.“. (2021). Retrieved March 6, 2023,
P1.
I love the speed with which you launch your argument, GoBirds, but “improve injury rates” does not immediately communicate as well as “reduce injuries” would.
🙂
P2.
You say there are 140 substances banned but not WHY THAT’S IMPORTANT. Use the same approach in every paragraph, GoBirds. Be sure your reader knows the PURPOSE of your claims. You want to show that with 140 drugs to avoid, it’s impossible for an athlete to feel confident taking ANYTHING even when he’s TRYING to comply.
P3.
Again, You’re naming a category of banned drugs. Why? Does it represent the drugs you want to “legalize” or “un-ban”? INDICATE the VALUE of this information. Do you agree or disagree with the logic of its category and the desirability of banning its members?
P4.
Repeat my instructions.
P5.
Repeat my instructions.
The third category of banned substances is performance enhancing substances. This category is divided into multiple subcategories. One of the subcategories is Anabolic Agents
Does anybody deliberately take them?
Do they show proven results?
Do you want them un-banned?
Why is this category important?
The next subcategory is Peptide Hormones, Growth Factors and Related Substances.
Repeat my instructions.
The last subcategory of PED’s I’ll cover is Diuretics and Masking Agents.
Repeat my instructions.
P6.
Performance Enhancing Substances have accounted for the most suspensions at the major league level, an average of over 6 players a year.
Did you really name all those categories and THEN dismiss the first two big ones as irrelevant to the conversation?
P7.
This should be your Introduction. We might be interested. The anecdote illustrates the problem with the Definition of Banned Substances and could make us CARE which substances are banned and which are not, and why it’s so damn hard to take anything without breaking a rule.
Fernando Tatis Jr. of the San Diego Padres was suspended 80 games after testing positive for clostebol, [a small component of an anti-fungal he took to treat ringworm]. “This is a fungus that is very common in athletes and they treat it with medication that contains Clostebol. Tatis trusted his physician and made a terrible mistake that cost him nearly a full season’s worth of suspension” according to MARCA, a sports media outlet. Although Tatis graciously accepted the ban, his “abuse” is not the sort MLB should be policing. This is where I believe a line needs to be drawn.
If you start with the Tatis story, you’ll establish interest in the “borderline cases” that are your real subject. And if readers can be made to care about the unfair treatment Tatis received, they’ll suddenly need to know what other substances are banned, and why, and whether it’s reasonable to expect players to knowingly avoid them.
THEN, your categorical paragraphs will have some RELEVANCE to something the readers care about. You’ll STILL have to clarify the importance of every claim.
Helpful, GoBirds? There’s a good argument here, but you’re burying it in details we DON’T KNOW ARE IMPORTANT until you FRAME THEM for us!
LikeLike