PTSD Claims-PinkHeart84

I was tasked with analyzing the claims within Section 20.

“Personal tragedy, suicide, depression, alcohol and drug use, reliving terror,” he rattles off as consequences. “Stress-related health problems—cardiovascular, immunologic. Heart attacks, stroke, and even dementia.”

 This is a Categorical Claim because it lists several examples of the consequences of PTSD and the symptoms. 

This is a Factual claim because it lists the facts of what may happen from PTSD.

“Residential rehab programs, and motor vehicle accidents because people with PTSD self-medicate and crash cars; the cost of domestic violence; the cost of children and grandchildren of combat vets witnessing domestic violence.”

This is a Factual Claim because it is stating facts on what people do to deal with their PTSD.

This is a Categorical Claim because it lists multiple consequences of PTSD.

This is a Evaluative Claim because it demonstrates that car crashes are a result of PTSD and adds the cost of kids observing violence as a cost of PTSD.

“The chaplain assured him that he shouldn’t feel bad about killing gooks, but the chaplain was paid by the Army, and who took moral advice from a chaplain carrying a .38? Back at home, Steve drank wildly.” 

This is a Proposal Claim because it says The word “shouldn’t”.

This is a Evaluation Claim because he ignores advice from the Chaplain who carries a .38

This is a Attributive Claim since it brings up a conversation that the Author didn’t see.

“He rattles off as consequences.”

This is an Attributive Claim the author uses because he brings in another person’s claim. 

“Charles Marmar, a New York University professor who was on the team of the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study, the most comprehensive study of combat stress ever conducted…”

This would be a Comparative Claim because the word “most” is used which shows comparison.

“There are an estimated 100,000 homeless vets on the street on any given night.”

This is a Ethic claim because it judges the homeless vets.

This is also a factual claim because it gives facts on a number of homeless vets. 

“There were 2.4 million soldiers deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, and while no one is sure what PTSD among them will ultimately cost us, either, everyone agrees on one thing: If it’s not effectively treated, it won’t go away.”

This is a factual claim because it states how many soldiers were deployed. 

This is a casual claim because it says what would happen if it is not treated. 

“When Caleb checked into his VA inpatient therapy in 2010, more than two-thirds of his fellow patients were veterans of Vietnam.”

This is a factual claim because it states how many patients were veterans.

This entry was posted in PinkHeart, PTSD Claims. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to PTSD Claims-PinkHeart84

  1. davidbdale says:

    “Residential rehab programs, and motor vehicle accidents because people with PTSD self-medicate and crash cars; the cost of domestic violence; the cost of children and grandchildren of combat vets witnessing domestic violence.”

    This is a Factual Claim because it is stating facts on what people do to deal with their PTSD.
    —Sure, but, it’s also Categorical, listing several items that could be called, CONSEQUENCES of PTSD.
    —That makes it Causal, too, because PTSD purportedly CAUSES all these behaviors and results.
    —It’s Evaluative, too, since it classifies car crashes as a result of PTSD, a stretch, and then adds the cost of kids WITNESSING violence as a cost of PTSD.

    “The chaplain assured him that he shouldn’t feel bad about killing gooks, but the chaplain was paid by the Army, and who took moral advice from a chaplain carrying a .38?”

    The word “shouldn’t” appears so this would be a Proposal Claim.
    —Sure, but it’s also Attributive since it reports an entire conversation the Author didn’t witness.
    —Yes, the Chaplain makes a Proposal Claim.
    —It’s also obviously an Ethical or Moral claim about how Steve should judge his actions.
    —It’s a deeply Evaluative claim by Steve, too, that he can safely ignore Ethical advice from a paid-for Chaplain who carries a .38.
    —And so on.

    Feel free to revise for a Regrade.
    Graded.

    Like

  2. pinkheart84 says:

    I edited and revised this.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s